The Forum > General Discussion > WMD Abusers
WMD Abusers
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
Posted by Col Rouge, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 8:46:59 AM
| |
Adam J LeBreton “we got WWII for our trouble, like the americans who were arming the nazis in the early stages.”
So you are blaming USA for the rise of Hitler? I would note USA had and has a large migrant German population as well as English, Irish, Polish and French etc. Certainly, when a nation is not at war with another, its people are free to pursue whatever links take their individual fancy but individuals pursuing private links does not constitute governmental support for “arming the nazis”. There was, following WWI, as part of the armistice negotiations, arms embargos and limits to allowable armarment holdings and research applied to Germany, which Hitler secretly broke in developing his tanks and aircraft etc. I would further note, USA UK and the Allies in WWI were instrumental participants in establishing the League of Nations, the forerunner of UN.. President Roosevelt was certainly a 100% supporter of Britain from before the onset of WWII and engineered “Lease-Lend” to circumvent opposition to military support of either side in US Congress, where a view of US neutrality prevailed. Leigh “You have more patience than I do in your dealings with the boofhead” It is a bit like mental sparing, it hones the brain and keeps me fit. Although, as a sparing partner Adam really isn’t up to much at all, he is already “on the ropes”. I think I might give him a few more whacks and call it a day, this is too easy, I am not even breaking into a sweat. Keep up the good work Bazz and Leigh, I do draw reassurance from knowing that others are equally offended by the moronic ravings of the ignorant. Posted by Col Rouge, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 8:48:55 AM
| |
" ... Adam, they throw their papers overboard ... "
U r preaching from the manifesto of the child abusers, propaganda parrot col rouge. In terms of the legitimate asylum seekers, it is just another one of howard's despicable distortions of the truths, in the same vein as the so called "Children overboard," to suggest that this is an act of wrong doing. In more cases than one, the legitimate ASYLUM SEEKERS have no choice but to throw their papers overboard because they reveal their identities & relegious persuasion, for which in turn they are persecuted, as is in the case of my friends from a minority Islamic sect from Iran. (who remain languishing in baxter) " ... maybe you could give me direct evidence of a reliable source to substantiate that claim. Particularly the “Racist” part. ... " I will happily refer U directly to the UN report if U really wish, but considering the fact that U r big anough and ugly enuff to wipe yr own bum, I feel that U would benefit greatly from direct reading of additional UN material yrSelf whilst searching. (aswell as that of the N.G.O's too for that matter.) If U get stuck, let me know and I'd be happy to oblige further in the interests of elevating yr consciousness from that of propaganda parrot to "Independent Thinker." ...Adam... P.S. A "Safe Haven" or "Safe Country" is at the discretion of the ASYLUM SEEKER and NOT those deceitful child abusers in Canberra. Posted by AJLeBreton, Thursday, 11 January 2007 10:33:35 PM
| |
Adam J Le Breton “I will happily refer U directly to the UN report if U really wish, but considering the fact that U r big anough and ugly enuff to wipe yr own bum, I feel that U would benefit greatly from direct reading of additional UN material yrSelf whilst searching. (aswell as that of the N.G.O's too for that matter.)’
Oh I have rattled your cage haven’t I. Thank you that makes my day. Let us see what we can make of your deranged ramblings. We could start with your inability to write “you”, although maybe you pronounce it “youse”. “Anough” and “enuff” is spelt “enough” and “yrself” is spelt “yourself” So you cannot spell. Now to the rest of your hissing fit. I claim you are a bare faced liar who has no evidentiary source to suggest your stupid and moronic claim that Australia has been labeled a “racist nation” in the UN. You see It was you who claimed it, it is not my responsibility to prove your claims, that is yours or do you leave the tough work to mummy to sort out for you, like clipping on your tie, doing up your laces and wiping your arse. As for “If U get stuck, let me know and I'd be happy to oblige further in the interests of elevating yr consciousness from that of propaganda parrot to "Independent Thinker."” Failed on all counts You do not know what “consciousness” is. I do not need the deluded fantasies of immature prats to suggest what an “independent thinker” is. Been there a long time and just because my “independent thoughts” does not conform with you imbecilicle definition is neither here nor there. As for “A "Safe Haven" or "Safe Country" is at the discretion of the ASYLUM SEEKER and NOT those deceitful child abusers in Canberra.” And attempting to circumvent Australian migration control is illegal. Whine and foam all you want, you impress no one and merely read like an immature ingrate who cannot spell and has the sort of presumptive writing style of the pampered tosser. Posted by Col Rouge, Thursday, 11 January 2007 11:14:07 PM
| |
The Children Overboard Mantra !
Just another part of the trendies chant sheet. You want to know what really happened ? They did throw children overboard but not for the reason most people believe. When the navy arrived the crew thought the navy might refuse to take them on board, so they scuttled the boat by openning the sea cocks. The boat started to sink and the parents realised they had to get the children off the boat in a hurry so they threw them into the ocean. At first Howard thought that they threw them in to put pressure on the navy. However it was the smugglers that openned the cocks as they did not want to take them back to Indonesia and so put pressure on the navy. Since then the smugglers meet up with a another boat, board it and leave the passengers to look after themselves so the crew don't spend time in gaol in Australia. Nice people eh! Moslems mostly, judging by their names. Posted by Bazz, Friday, 12 January 2007 2:58:55 PM
| |
"likely red-necks and likely supporters of the child abusers howard et al, whose only resort is name calling " http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=355#6420
Now thats an interesting line. I wish I could underline bits like "red-neck" and "child abusers" and "name calling". Does the author support a different set of politicians? Ones who have at some stage actually had the responsibility of government and who have managed to avoid causing harm to children by the policies they have implemented (or failed to implement). If so I would be interesting to know which politicians have achieved that goal. Can't think of any myself. R0bert Posted by R0bert, Friday, 12 January 2007 5:36:22 PM
|
Adam, they throw their papers overboard on the boat immediately before they get here (they needed them for travel through Malaysia and/or Indonesia) but get close to Australia and there no point pretending to be (for example) an Afghani if you have Pakistani identity papers in your pocket (which would mean the Australian Authorities would ship the illiegal immigrant back to Pakistan quicker than if the illegal immigrant arrives paperless).
“howard et al have been condemned by the UN before the entire world as rascists”
maybe you could give me direct evidence of a reliable source to substantiate that claim. Particularly the “Racist” part.
A reliable source being a website under the guardianship and management of the UN, not some bonko malcontent nutters spleen venting hatchet site.