Everyone is entitled to have dreams and aspirations. Martin Luther King had a dream that all Americans would one day be equal. Belly has a dream that Kevin Rudd will have three terms. However dreams do not fill empty bellies, put roofs over homeless people, end global warming if it exists, or ensure a Prime Minister will pass his exam at the end of the term.

When we look back at the Rudd government, if that is to be its fate, it will probably be the tour by Father Frank Brennan and Mary Kostakidas, around Australia at the behest of Robert McClelland that will be marked as a tipping point. Copenhagan and the assumption that the Sovereignty of Australia as a corporation could be assigned to a foreign power called the United Nations is another. However the worst criminal act of the present government is its failure to rein in and curb rampant dishonesty by State Governments.

Paul Keating’s government passed a lot of laws that were very beneficial to the Commonwealth. Howards government blocked and opposed every one of them, and to do so maintained the Courts they created in the Federal Court of Australia and High Court during the Fraser years. The Family Court is still an abomination. None of these can be maintained as legal, because none are prepared to abide the laws made by Paul Keating’s government.

As corporations, people have no right to challenge the board of directors, in corporate Australia, while the government treats criminals as people but civilians as corporations.

Australian Law was predicated upon a Royal Identifier. One Seal that was representing the ultimate authority, which to Christians is Almighty God. A copy of that Seal is affixed to the website here: http://www.community-law.info/

That Seal was affixed to the Australian Constitution. It was affixed to the Proclamation making Australia a self governing Nation. But it is evidence of the only One World Government that will work. That is government under the Rule of Law set out in the Holy Bible. 520,000 Commonwealth subjects died in World War II defending that concept

rehctub, indi(bloody)val,et al,

To which plot are you referring? Me thinks you mean he's lost the plot you wanted him to adopt.
Personally I'm glad he didn't, logic dictates that we would be in real bother had he adopted your views.

That isn't to say that as a leader he isn't flawed and only slightly better that what else is in parliament that he can be replaced with.

I do think that it is the likes of you with your hands-off-but complain-a-lot-at-whom-ever is in the seat attitude, that maintains the system whereby we have a parliament full of party and self interested politicians.

I have long campaigned for a more equitable *system*.

I find it interesting to note that the best the ad hominem brigade can offer is tweedle dee in lieu of tweedle dum.

Note the abject hypocrisy of The Mad Monk's utterances about virginity advocating his girls should hang on to it. Despite Daddy believing he had an illegitimate son.i.e. he certainly didn't protect his.
In truth gentlemen, you are entitled to your opinions but so long as the *SYSTEM* remains the criticisms, in the topic's context is moot.

The infantile temper-tantrum-tossing krudd hasn't vacated any of his Peking predator panderer positions nor drifted from the plot.

Like his similarly self-and-own-culture-loathing ideological twin (who has also never had an actual job, cashed an earned check, been responsible to a profit, met a payroll, worked even a night-shift at a 7-Eleven or driven a day-shift in a cab!) at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington DC, the Canberra krudd lives in an entirely delusionally-fantasized fascistic fairyland - a utopia that will exist when he and his pseudo-intellectual elitist ilk create it.

The Canberra krud marches to a band whose ump pah-pahs reach the ears only of similar self-anointed savants - in the vacant lots of whose minds flourishes only the narcissistic noxious weed the rest of us call the Power Lust.

And just as his positives are our negatives, his spending represents our losses, his "carbon credits" represent the theft of Peter Spencer's property -- and of that of every other land-owner? Thus he sees as his greatest triumphs those of his actions and activities that we perceive to be his most horrendous failures and to be most destructive of our freedoms and to effect the most egregious advancement of the totalitarian tyranny into which we, post-Whitlam, are being whirled?

Our every loss marks the totalitarian tyrant's every win!

Brian Richard Allen
Lost Angels - Califobambicated 90028
And the Very Far Abroad

Welcome BRA and what a load of rubbish!
PV hardly the wild north coast here mate.
And come, you while focused on other things are not silly, do you think location ensures understanding
Rudd has the next election in the bag, within not much more than one week poor old Tony Abbott takes the stage, the sexist, betrayer of his own leader own stated thoughts gets his chance.
It is already written, not unlike mad Mark Latham he has quickened the heart beat of some in his party.
The end result stand by for the very same outcome.
What then
In Rudd's second term some shine will come of, the fact is it always was going to happen.
But who can turn the shattered internally crippled[ it is you know] conservatives party, it will only be one party soon, not Abbott.
Without a healing, without dumping such as the shadow minister for smoking and dead wood like Tucky and both Bishops Rudd or his successor is assured of three terms.
I get the feeling PV you only give credit to your brand of Christian.
And Latham? he takes the credit for not being the man he said he was, in his own way his self destruction was his only service of worth he ever did the ALP, one I remain grateful for.

Examinator; To which plot are you referring?

Acctually, I was refering to his plans for population growth in the next few decades. It is just that his supporters have come out in force to defend something that I have not mentioned here. Almost a perceived guilt trip hey! In any case, his past two odd years have yielded very few 'completed' trophies to skite about.

Now if we had an over supply of fruit, veg etc that was forcing prices down, or, if we had doctors emptying bins due to lack of work, or, if we had two teachers and one aid per class room, or, if we has near zero unemployment, or, if we had no such things as over crowded detention centers for immigrents, OR, if we had no water restrictions or no housing crisis, or no aging population crisis luming, THEN and only THEN should we consider boosting our population by some 60%.

So I ask again, Has he lost the plot?

Ah rechtub again and again you get those boots on intent on kicking your Krudd doll and fall over them.
While Abbott says different now, he and his party believe population is the growth food we need, that may very well not be true.
Growth is not always a good idea.
But both ships of state, look at migration figures under Howard, both temp and full time, we have to convince both sides it is wrong.
After the election, after voters have spoken, you without doubt, will say voters have lost the plot.
you will remember this post, try so hard not to say it, but you will say it.
it is crystal clear you see only your views and dislikes and have no intention of letting the light of reality shine in, who has lost the plot?