The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The New White Australia Policy

The New White Australia Policy

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. Page 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. 18
  13. 19
  14. All
All-, my sledgehammer subtlety sometimes is confusing, I know, but the quote that you jumped on with glee was actually extracted from an earlier Boaz_David entry.

Your mistake ought to make Boaz sit up and take notice, though, before he embarks on his personal "Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Führer" journey.

See, Boaz, how easy it is to be misunderstood?
Posted by Pericles, Wednesday, 3 January 2007 4:50:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If understood properly, a “there needs to be a distinguishable difference between Racism-Xenophobes and Natural resentment of Criminal Intent displayed by our Looting Elites. And never shall the two meet” allows your, ALL, clear differentiation between hatred on mere biological grounds Hiller spread worldwide and a Marx’s call on annihilating the super-riches non-discriminatorily.
Posted by MichaelK., Wednesday, 3 January 2007 9:47:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yung Yong said "a nation that opens doors and provides people from all backgrounds to embrace life and allowing them to reach their lifelong potential and dreams."

Australia is not a charitable organisation. Immigration should be primarily for the benefit of the people already here. That's why we want migrants who are able to contribute economically, intellectually and socially. In order to meaningfully contribute to Australian life and reach their maximum potential, migrants should be encouraged to integrate. Integration requires a sound knowledge of English. This may sound trite, but it needs to be reiterated. Can you imagine if the early non-British migrants refused to adopt English in favour of their mother tongues? The result would have been ethno-lingual separatism. Call me a bigot, but I fail to comprehend how social fragmentation enriches Australia.
Posted by Oligarch, Thursday, 4 January 2007 1:51:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It might be a long draw on a bow Michael, but the Marxoid synthesis has been replicated to date, just by the very nature of the called wealth distribution opens avenues for extremely unethical people; Although the premise of such an argument as Wealth distribution is Nobel, it is non the less an absurd Altruistic nonsense of total unachievable status.
It is the profound use of Moral sole ripping and tearing in Human and emotional psychology to present a solution where none can exist or will ever exist but only to bolster Proletariat Ideology by (Propaganda- Misinformation), Just by the very principles of its existence is an Oxymoron and does not have any foundations that would withstand probity.
It would not just be a coincidence the reference to Hitler, He did not act alone; But it is unusually predictable that Hitler is used and National- “Socialism” as the expendable vanguard- when the Proletariat decimation and body count’s would be very well much higher.
I would be interested to hear others views in reference to the Islamic Imperialism and colonization process at the moment , but I do not think I will hear the same level of criticism some how.
Posted by All-, Thursday, 4 January 2007 2:40:50 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Australian values are not racist, we allow persons of different races to coexist. Where the conflict arises is in social values and different laws.

We believe all persons are equal before the law, and justice in cases of offense is administered by the State upon a balanced and fair trial.

We do not accept death under any circumstances as a sentence for an offender. Once death becomes a sentence then any crime can warrant death depending upon the law-makers and the Judges.

Tribalism: where tribal / cultural laws are enforced they have never witnessed National justice and harmony. The example Rainer raised on the history of tribal Australia pre modern settlement never witnessed settlement and reconciliation between them as they saw pay back as the balance of justice. However what one tribe saw as just the other saw as need to pay back by death to balance the books. The problem is they had no books to account for when justice was reached. Their justice was administered on their emotions at the time.

There needs to be universal values within the society. Australia is built upon the philosophy of universalism and all persons have equal value and responsibility within the society to see it function peacefully and harmonously for the good of all. Selfishness also is a tribal attitude that detracts from the greater good of society. The opposite value is generosity of heart, and I find Australians are generally generous people. However they hate abusers of their or others generosity.
Posted by Philo, Thursday, 4 January 2007 10:08:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ALL-
Redistribution of wealth is a natural process in societies where people achieve results on own natural rather then inherited socio-financial merits only.

Oligarch -
I share your opinion of non-charitable nature of Australia, highlighted by a number of foreign diplomats/politicians, due to immigration debates in their countries. However, integration is a two-way process, and a notion of preparedness of Anglo-Saxons/Celts to equal rather than patronising tolerantly-coexisting attitudes towards out-tribe-rs has been professionally avoided both in this forum and in the media.

Philo-
I think I've addressed your post with a message above.
Posted by MichaelK., Thursday, 4 January 2007 1:43:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. Page 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. 18
  13. 19
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy