The Forum > General Discussion > The New White Australia Policy
The New White Australia Policy
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
-
- All
Posted by MichaelK., Sunday, 7 January 2007 12:55:35 AM
| |
Thanks Michael, but my intention in regards to anti-Semitism is not directed at you, but as a broad overview and a driver for Ideological possessed purposes of those Totalitarian inclinations.
Ummm, the Anglos-sphere was a simple intentional trap, but you did answer the whole intended concept; Germany – USA-Russia- etc- a once common trait out side the political philosophy that was hijacked. Their principled existence is No More relevant today as ours will be. They have capitulated and have submitted to their control Totalitarian Freaks and will now depend on them for basic survival. What a Lovely place we have now The State will provide? ; Absolute convoluted crap. The Useless Idiot incorporated would be hard pressed finding the toilet bowl- as they have been so use to peeing in our pockets for so long. And you let them? Posted by All-, Sunday, 7 January 2007 6:09:25 AM
| |
By the way, this web site; http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/educate/new_class/morrison/postmodern.html#academic%20theory
Just about sums up the freak show we all must endure now days; How about we just get back to basics and get on with it? Posted by All-, Sunday, 7 January 2007 7:15:34 AM
| |
I personally like the idea of a citizenship test. I think it a great thing if one knows the history of where they live and can feel some amount of pride. But introducing the language barrier is silly. That limits many people of the world. And most of the immigrants who are moving to what they hope to a better life will probably respect and be much more loyal than many spoiled children of Australia. And by living in the country they will eventually learn English and therefore making it the only language for a citizenship test is only causing unnecessary controversy.
I thank Boaz for the laugh at how any topic can become religious. And I should like to add that I am a strong believer that religion and politics should never mix. Back on TOPIC. If this citizenship test is indeed a way to keep immigrants out of Australia, then I am sorry Canada's government was once thought of as similar to Australia. I love the idea of immigrants. They are bringing more to a country, not taking things away. Posted by Alia24, Sunday, 7 January 2007 11:10:52 AM
| |
Interesting site, All, at least from viewpoint of a comprehensive volume of information provided.
My opinion is simple as a cow’s moo: adjusted to environment where trance-English Channel relatives in France were becoming shorter on their heads upon “turmoils”, English royalty had adapted a then really revolutionary British parliamentary system. As centuries pass by, France, the USA and many other countries among which modern post-communist Eastern European states are, integrate in and further develop a notion of democracy, of which a traditional grounding British form today is as much workable as a first automobile produced in a next to the next to the last century. Moreover, news from France -that is a traditionally subversive rival- just questions too much in modern Australia: http://fr.news.yahoo.com/06012007/290/acte-de-cannibalisme-a-rouen-l-avocat-denonce-la-maison.html (An inmate had eaten parts of lungs and a heart of co-prisoner while in the same cell a third man was witnessing all set of fried meal consumption process). So, were they all-French or descending from other backgrounds? And how any sort of education could allow such a happening at Rouen’s state prison? And had inmates got a France's citizenship? And, and, and… Probably, all these questions can surely be avoided by those told being the MOST human humans already inheritably. However, Jack the Ripper is a part of a British history not less unknown worldwide than his nowadays follower in Ipswich, or toddler boy-killers for instance. Posted by MichaelK., Sunday, 7 January 2007 3:17:58 PM
| |
Pericles
on that one point you are absolutely correct. I see no possibility for cultural unity with Islam in the picture. Not a skeric. I've never hidden this. Your criticism of my reference to Surah's and hadiths surprises me, I suppose if you were a trustee of a discretionary trust you would make no reference whatsoever to the terms and rules of such a trust ? Sadly Pericles, your lack of realizing where things are heading, does not change that dangerous direction. But apart from Islam, I am vigorously promoting cultural and racial unity. Alia... your view is a personal one, rather than an "Islamic" one, where religion and state are in fact intertwined and one and the same. You have adjusted your approach to enable you to accomodate the fact that you are living in a basically not Muslim country and this is fine as far as it goes. As I've said many times, the likes of you and Fellow Human and Irfan are not who I perceive as a threat. Those I see as threats are the ones on the radical end of the spectrum. But the radicals in my view, are the real Muslims, as they adhere to the principles of Sharia and that is where it gets ugly. Wahabbism and Salafism are not far from us. 19 Micheal Street Brunswick to name but one. We have 13 men on trial in Melbourne, 11 in Sydney, 6 rocket launchers are still to be found (evidence suggests they are currently held by radical Muslim criminals) I notice that the IISC was holding a BBQ 'against racism and sexual assault'.. I'd love to have been there with a sign saying "Australia rejects Surah 23:5-6" which in fact AUTHORIZES sexual abuse of captive slave girls for all time. I think you have been brought up with Islam and thus simply accept it because its ur culture. Please have a peek at this http://www.truetruth.wikispaces.com Alia..have you ever had a real close look at surah 33:50 ? Posted by BOAZ_David, Monday, 8 January 2007 6:36:32 AM
|
Regrettably, ignoring reality is not synonymously to being even pro-overseas-crown loyal, not speaking of real interests of Australia in the time approaching.
So, All, "Anglo-sphere" is an official terminology used worldwide and must not be treated as the swearing by surprisingly pretending on something worldwide heralded by Australian governments, which is sure employment opportunities for skilled newcomers from outside the UK system especially.
I hardly get your hint on something anti-Semitic in my posts because an influx of South-African supremacists from non-Jewish background very much increased a number of so-called "Australian scientists" at local universities, where ethnics usually present at their historically-native either language departments or particular schools of religious studies, traditionally.
Surely, a number of India/Sri Lanka-originating lecturers is on rise as well, because they are similarly as much practically experienced as in subjects of their lecturing as having-once-some-technology-working-seen UK-linked local minders gratifying each other and their kids with perks at academia.
And you are, ALL, absolutely wrong speaking of Anglo-sphere as still a only magnet for migrants: Germany, Russia and the USA, that what estimated by a UN commission on international labour migration if I memorized rightly this UN particular office NICKNAME.
Moreover, a number of skilled legal migrants to Russia is tripled last year, and a Tampa-style workers' number is about seven millions, which is comparable with all the work-capable population of Australia.
Conclusively, Col.Rouge & aka's lack of elementary data on both internal and international issues hardly makes me crying for not being an object picked for playing their some English with.