The Forum > General Discussion > The New White Australia Policy
The New White Australia Policy
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Have you a contract with me to write your posts?
You sound so much like me, Spooky.
That said, whilst supporting the same expectations of individualism, my view on mandatory competence in English to qualify for citizenship in Australia is diametrically opposed to yours.
Anyone who migrated here with “ideas and passion”, “visions” and “opinions” would surely, see the reason for us all to communicate with a common language, rather than risk social fragmentation into a bunch of ethnically contained tribes desperately clinging to the traditions of a previous culture, at the expense of their own development.
Such issues mirror the problems of the Quebecois, hanging on to a 200 years old version of French, a version which has failed to develop or keep pace with the European version of French and seriously fracturing the political stability of Canada
Rainier “the evils of mono-culturalist/ethno nationalist thinking such as that which Hitler espoused.”
Not only Hitler. Anyone who supported the ideals of Esperanto would carry that label.
Anyone who thought their might be merit in being able to communicate with their next door neighbours, rather than treating them as as foreign as their language would also carry that label.
Michaelk “Your explicit rudeness and nicknaming”
“Explicit” good, you are at last learning to understand what I am writing about you, more than I can say for most of your posts
“rudeness” anyone who expresses their bigotry by perverting the English language falls below the line to which rudeness could be deployed.
“Nicknaming” I have referred to you solely as “Michaelk” and by no other acronym.
That you might be upset by what I write is understandable.
I consider you have no redeeming qualities to counter what is conveyed in your posts, that is as one of the most bigoted and offensive abusers of written English it has been my displeasure to encounter.
Banjo, conveys a politer version of my view