The Forum > General Discussion > Missing Fathers evade Responsibiliy for their children.
Missing Fathers evade Responsibiliy for their children.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- ...
- 48
- 49
- 50
-
- All
Posted by Seeker, Thursday, 6 August 2009 9:47:30 PM
| |
Thanks for your kind words Fractelle and PP.
Enjoy the slideshow, provided especially for our disgruntled dads. http://www.2coolfishing.com/ttmbforum/attachment.php?attachmentid=211480&d=1245883551 Posted by Protagoras, Thursday, 6 August 2009 10:12:24 PM
| |
Protagoras, nice slide show but I wish you'd drop the digs at fathers. The fathers who abandon their kids are unlikely to be the ones online distressed by a system which only seems to value them for their capacity to earn.
Some dads do just walk out because they don't care, others are shut out or get to the point where trying to have a role in their childrens lives carries a cost to their children and themselves which they can't sustain. I've never been to that point but did accept changes to residency which I was strongly opposed to for that reason. I still had a regular role, it was clear that the changes would be damaging but the ongoing fight was more so. I have a good friend who eventually had to accept that he could not stop his ex's attempts to shut him out of his daughters life, all he could change to stop a part of the hurt to his daughter and himself was his attempts to have an ongoing role. I enjoyed the presentation because I get the good side of kids growing both with my son and my partners children. For the parents who don't get to do all those things with their kids because their kids have been taken to another part of the country or their times with their children are so constrained by an ex's control that they are not fun for anybody it would be a very painful slideshow. R0bert Posted by R0bert, Thursday, 6 August 2009 10:53:34 PM
| |
MaryE, in regard of the case involving the HCA and CSA even refunding monies to him by way of a cheque this is documented by me in my book published on 27 May 2008 titled;
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on the battle SCHOREL-HLAVKA v BLACKSHIRTS For the quest of JUSTICE, in different ways. Book on CD. (ISBN 0-9580569-4-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-4-6 Then go to tif documents in folder; CHAPTER 23 Abbotts case/Further material/Bogus Child Support claims/ 961105cheque.tif As such not only does this folder include the refund cheque but also shows how some $36.869.46 was credited back by CSA. As such the book included the statements of CSA, etc, to prove it all! I am not a person to make up stories as the evidence was already published by me in the above mentioned book. The book is in the national Library of Australia at Canberra and also in the State Library of Victoria with these and other details. You can always go to my website http://www.schorel-hlavka.com as shown also with my identity and contact me via email for details. there are woman who gave me the understanding that had they known that Legal aid would claim cost back from them they would never have persisted in litigation as they never realised that tin the end they would have to pay the legal bill from any property settlement, etc. Well, I always made clear that they should have considered that when they were litigating as now it is too late. Having been a single father for up to 5 children I know how important it is to care for children and in my view any woman/man who is the homemaker should be entitled to half of what the other parent is making. Because generally woman are the full time carers for children I view their rights to anything achieved during the marriage equally belong to them. I would however make sure that any superannuation is not touchable until retirement age as to avoid also the loss of investment, etc. As such changes are needed to provide for that. Posted by Mr Gerrit H Schorel-Hlavka, Friday, 7 August 2009 2:06:01 AM
| |
SJF
"As a woman and a feminist, I’m flattered by your supportive remarks" The truth is that I have supported women' rights for long time. From the begin of 1980 you will find me in open discusion on state TV defending and promoting working women's rights. later you will see that in my office (union movement) to write the constitution for a women organization to promote housewife's rights. In australia everything has been wrong for me,plus sole parent with three children. "Women are no more or less progressive, racist or democratic than men" From the study about race discrimination in Australia How often have YOU experienced discrimination because of your OWN ETHNIC ORIGIN in the following situations? At Sport or public event 20.2% for male , 10.9% for women! How often have YOU experienced discrimination because of your OWN ETHNIC ORIGIN in the following situations? In the workplace Male 20.8%, Female 12.8% Analysis of last Election Results in USA — Women and Young Voters Were Key Seventy (70%) percent of unmarried women supported Obama! "Nineteen per cent of men do not believe carbon emission reduction to be of any importance as opposed to just two per cent of women." Australia - Postgrad Women Trailing Men in Salaries Women with postgraduate qualifications are earning between $3,000 and $10,000 a year less than their male counterparts, new figures show "A woman meets a man, falls in love, moves in, gets married, has kids and it all falls apart. It's not until this moment that she realises just how dependent she is on her partner's money." Women who contribute 70 per cent or more of the weekly income start doing more housework rather than less, the study shows. Without doupt women are more progresive, less racists and more democratic. Personaly while I am an agresive supporter of women's rights I found my self offensive in few cases. I would like to apology to The Pied Piper for my behavior. Antonios Symeonakis Adelaide Posted by ASymeonakis, Friday, 7 August 2009 6:19:00 AM
| |
R0bert:"the fathers who abandon their kids are unlikely to be the ones online distressed by a system which only seems to value them for their capacity to earn."
Spot on, R0bert, but anathema to the "victim-riders" who see activist and active fathers as a threat to the livelihood of their "constituency". Besides, "all men are bastards, I know because I was married to one" is much easier to pontificate about than "some men are bastards, some men are pretty good and some are excellent". Borderline personalities dislike nuance. Posted by Antiseptic, Friday, 7 August 2009 7:57:42 AM
|
That would then explain this:
http://www.smh.com.au/world/newlywed-dalia-accused-of-hitman-plot-20090806-eao5.html