"Why should a movement that is by women, about women, for women – one that exists to raise awareness of women’s viewpoints, women’s existence, women’s realities, women’s needs, women’s problems – be criticized for ‘automatically’ sticking up for women?

After all, that’s what advocacy groups do – they automatically stick up for their members, regardless of the rights and wrongs of a situation."

Posted by SJF, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 4:26:19 PM

"'Feminism has only one rule: Women are right, no matter what they say or do.
Deny that'

No problem. I deny it. Because it's untrue. It's a well-pedalled misrepresentation by anti-feminist mens groups who notoriously use the pain of the divorce system as one of its favoured weapons to get embittered men on side."

Posted by SJF, Wednesday, 24 June 2009 4:35:46 PM

erm... someone seems confused. That's the trouble with being dishonest, it always catches up with you...

Now that we've cleared up who's doing the misrepresenting, tell us again how asking questions is bullying and you can't be bothered spending time talking to us. That always gives me a chuckle.

"Kia kaha, TPP."

I’m not when facing anything with 8 legs Seeker, it was huge, I nearly called the police.

Max:“Feminism has only one rule: Women are right, no matter what they say or do.”

It is certainly one of my house rules Max. This is because “I am mum” rather than “hear me roar”.

But hey I thought there was a big problem here with the family court and its policy of granting access to abusive parents because their parental rights were held as more important than anything else? I spent some time watching youtube and the reporters and parents a few weeks ago in different courts around Australia. The courts appear to be wrong, wrong but fair.

Wow SJF, men in gangs aye, NRL players in groups. Wish I could have lent you my husband for the day; he has no tolerance for bullies no matter what the agenda.

Dear Antiseptic,

I'm glad that we've been able to share ideas
and points of view in this discussion. And yes,
I see no reason as to why males should not
be on the Boards of female clubs. As I stated
earlier - it takes a brave Board to look outside
the square and choose a Director who may offer a
diverse point of view. That should apply to both male
and female clubs equally.

Take care.

the author of this pearler,
"Feminism has only one rule: Women are right, no matter what they say or do",
is complaining that women do not have a right
to advocacy of their own kind,
regardless of the rights and wrongs of a situation.

this insinuation, that Australian women
should be subject to the suspension of the rule of law,
is both heinous and a central tenet of Al Qaeda doctine.

Australian women have every right to advocacy of the own kind,
and should do so with provision of a women's legislature.

whistler:"the author of this pearler,
"Feminism has only one rule: Women are right, no matter what they say or do",
is complaining that women do not have a right
to advocacy of their own kind,
regardless of the rights and wrongs of a situation.

this insinuation, that Australian women
should be subject to the suspension of the rule of law,
is both heinous and a central tenet of Al Qaeda doctine."

I don't know about al Qaeda, but SJF is way off the planet in terms of gender relations. Let's face it, if even you think she's off beam, she's not merely misjudged her audience, she's so far off as to be irrelevant to any sensible discussion. Thanks for pointing that out.

Antiseptic you're an Al Qaeda stooge.
your colleague Maximillion cited the doctrine that:
"Feminism has only one rule ...", not SJF.
your erroneous claim as the basis of this thread that Rugby League is a male sport
brands you as an outsider.
you've fooled nobody with your attempt
to use Rugby League
to fulfil the your misogynist ambitions.