If you cry when you see how much money is stolen from you in taxes, remember that before the revolution in 1970, taxes were very low. It could be low, and was low because a huge amount of revenue came from fines and up to half the Crown budget was collected from criminals. That is criminals like the Motorcycle Clubs. Nah, the corporate criminals.

The Supreme Court Act 1970 is the Act that disestablished Christianity as a system in New South Wales. It created two justice systems, one for ordinary people and one for alleged criminals. The one for ordinary people, who were in dispute, was put in charge of Judges. This is the system that worships Baal. (Parliament) It sacrifices people to their God, lives are destroyed arbitrarily, and people are traded like cattle by lawyers and public servants. The Supreme Court Act 1970 repealed forty Acts, that gave us freedom, and put us under lawyers rule. Queensland went rotten in 1991.

S 6 says: Inconsistency with rules: Any Act in force immediately before the commencement of this Act, which is inconsistent with the rules, shall be superseded to the extent of such inconsistency and while such inconsistency continues to exist. The Federal Court uses rules the same way.

In this way New South Wales repealed the Australian Constitution. This is a revolution for which we are all paying on a daily basis. It was done by the Liberal Party. It was payback for donations from organised crime. It allows lawyers to buy and sell people, and destroy people’s lives without redress.

From 1275, and a law that is still in force in Victoria, ( they went the same in 1986) it was possible for anyone except for murder and treason, to elect to pay a fine instead of going to jail. This was good business, and kept petty crims working. It was much cheaper to get a fine than imprison people. Instead you now pay taxes to send them to jail. Government monkey business, by monkeys and not Good Government, as for the Police, they are simply slaves.

Dear Non-Farmer
Could you be more speciffic as to the town you are from as, if I ever get the urge to do a 'road trip' to the 'outback' then I most certainly would like to by-pass your town as I would hate to think I may catch what you have.

Thank god for foxtel hey!

Cheers

p.s. Is there anyone you don't hate?

Which State of Australia is going to be first to reintroduce Christianity as law again. Because of our unique Federation, the first State to institute accountability, and mandatory jury trials, as existed in Queensland until 1991, will be able to reduce taxes to almost zero, and get a huge revenue boost from imbeciles like the Judges of the Federal Court.

When exercising federal jurisdiction, any court anywhere in Australia has jurisdiction over the whole of Australia. This is s 15C Acts Interpretation Act 1901 ( Cth). If a member of a Motorcycle Club in New South Wales is persecuted by Police there, he could, until 1991, in Queensland sue the New South Wales constable in his personal capacity, in a court in Queensland, and have a guaranteed jury trial. This is because of S 118 Constitution.

The catch is it must be a court, not a Court. A Court is a place where a Judge presides. It is a Masonic Temple, where a man or woman, without reference to a higher power, buys and sell justice. How long will it be before the great Christian majority that elected Kevin Rudd, and refused to elect Mark Latham, wakes up to the fact that Christian is best. A court is Christian, a Court is pagan. A Judge cannot be a Christian too. He can go to church as many Sundays as he likes, and his priest can tell him he is forgiven, but the Book says, Judge not that ye be not judged. That applies to these simple minded fools just as much as to you and me.

Talk to the Cameron Dick. It might as well be Queensland. I would love to come back, and show this State how to shake heaps and heaps of money out of Canberra’s back pocket. It would be fun to shake lots of money out of New South Wales Police too. This is what the National Competition Policy Act 1995 was supposed to do. This is what John Howard feared. We do not need one new law, just an honest Attorney General

Non Farmer, you wrote;

“You suggest in your response that I hate police?
Forgive me for being startled by your comment.”

Startled?

I was responding to your comment:

“What hope is there for a bloke who used to ride the highways free - (except for the hate of the Qld police).”

Anyway, thanks for the response.

.
So, given that bikers are as free to ride as they have ever been, is it such a bad thing that restrictions be placed on them doing so as a gang or a club, when there is a well-known correlation between such organisations and organised crime?

It is inevitable that personal freedoms will be impinged upon and that some people will be affected that have nothing to do with crime. But then that’s the way of it with the law in general. When a small fraction of people act in an irresponsible manner, the rights of a large number of people are affected, either by the actions of those irresponsible people or by preventative lawful actions. That has to be the way of it in many situations, in order to keep the law relatively simple and manageable. It is all too often a very difficult balancing act.

So all considered, I think that strong affirmative action to greatly reduce organised crime within motorcycle gangs by way of abolishing the actual organisations is not an unreasonable course of action.

Non-farmer

I have a motorcycle license too - has your home been raided yet? Mine hasn't and I don't expect it to be any time soon. It is specific gangs of bikers that are being targeted, not the average joe/joanne. Try reading more than just headlines and stick to broadsheet rather than tabloids.

Pointless thread, dunno why I'm even bothering.

Non-farmer,
Are you a criminal ....I give up are you?
If you the person(s) who like to make as much noise with your bike regardless of the legal limit at 3 am ? The one photographed going through a red light camera at twice the legal or 3X speed past a school during hours(3X40ks)? The one photographed doing 185 k through a speed camera without plates? The one who exceed the speed limit by 40 ks then did a victory wheel stand mentioned in the paper? Ride wearing 'colours' of well known criminal gang?
And a thousand other sundry violations?
Or perhaps a proprietor of a meths lab, gun running, prostitution, stand over merchant etc.
If non of the above then maybe your victimized attitude is misplaced and Fractelle is offering sound advice.
Then again... we haven't covered all the other crimes like budgie smuggling or DRF (being Drunk and Refusing to Fight) :-)