Tribal law demands a Chief. Jews by training consider themselves superior, and when Abraham Gilbert Saffron made enough money to buy Norman Allen and Rob Askin, he also bought the Liberal Party and New South Wales. The Barristers he bought to defend him, have had no problems sitting as Judges without juries.

To some extent this answers Maximilion’s question. Why is the qui tam action not used all the time. The answer is because the Jewish lobby has destroyed the legal system. The English legal system, that Jews in the public service refuse to recognize, was completely destroyed in New South Wales in 1970, and Jewish Law, with a Judge instead of a court, an Old Testament institution was substituted.

The Jewish legal system encourages the likes of the drug trade. With Jewish government, a system adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, with an all powerful Pope, the Chief/Judge can be bribed. Money can talk. The Jewish legal system is oppressive to individualism, and demands conformity. As we see in Gaza it shows no mercy.

As a consequence on the Jewish Legal System, adopted illegally and without a referendum, most of us are carrying the criminal element in society, and paying an enormous amount of extra taxation. Much taxation is unjust, but the Jewish legal system does not allow it to be challenged. When Menzies abolished as of right juries in Bankruptcy jurisdiction in 1966, he introduced Jewish Law. The number of good businesses destroyed by the Australian Taxation Office using bankruptcy is beyond count.

One of that criminal element is serving time because his arrogance got him onto trouble. We may have to wait for the total collapse of the States under debt, before the Jewish Legal system largely abolished by Keating legislation, between 1993 and 1995, is finally removed. Jews worship the Law. Protestant Christians worship the Trinity.

The Trinity as a form of government has stood since 1297. Father/Justice, Son/jury, and Holy Spirit, acting through a collective conscience of 12 people sitting in every court at the right hand of the Father delivering JUSTICE; truly Royal

Dear Peter the Believer,

Thanks for telling me all that. I've been a Jew for 83 years but never knew we hated juries. Glad you told me all that. Thanks.

Dear Peter the Believer,

I would like to correct some of misinformation you have been spreading about Jews.

Jews do not worship the law. Jews worship God and follow the law to different degrees. The God that Jews worship is one God and not divided in parts. He is neither in humanoid form like the gods of the ancient Romans nor the humanoid god figure of the Christians in the form of Jesus.

Most Jews recognize that the Bible was written in a different time and a different society and some of the laws are no longer followed. Eg. Polygamy and slavery are permitted in the Bible and the New Testament. Both Christians and Jews recognize that we are no longer living in those times and practice neither polygamy nor slavery.

You wrote: “The Jewish legal system encourages the likes of the drug trade. With Jewish government, a system adopted by the Roman Catholic Church, with an all powerful Pope, the Chief/Judge can be bribed. Money can talk. The Jewish legal system is oppressive to individualism, and demands conformity.”

The above is not true. The Catholic Church has adopted the Roman system which has a single head in the emperor and has the same administrative system. A diocese was a Roman unit of government, and the pope is the single head of the Catholic Church.

Jews have no single entity who speaks for all like the pope nor do Jews demand conformity. Each congregation is independent and hires and fires its rabbi without having to consult any other authority. Rabbis have no sacerdotal functions like priests and are merely learned men.

The Hebrew word for bribery is shohad. It is prohibited in Deuteronomy 16:19. Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.

Bribery violates Jewish law.

In the Talmud views of the majority and the minority opinion are both recorded. As in a democracy the opinions of a minority may become that of a majority.

Peter the Believer, you just lost any support you may have got from me. I don't hold with racial stereotyping or prejudice, however it's couched, and to reduce the development of the democratic and legal system we live with to a religious war is patently ridiculous, in my opinion.
Oh, and as far as I recall, that lion was a symbol of the English feudal ruling class(denoting power and bravery), and they persecuted the Jews as readily as any other society at the time. Any group that holds themselves separate from, and superior to, the culture they live in is always going to set off man's innate xenophobia, which would seem to explain most of Jewish history, world-wide.

Pericles,

OK, your position is 'independent of any pack'. So what's your independent motivation for sinking the boot?

Antiseptic,

Anti-semitism was lurking in your mind because you read an article about synagogue members being upset about Einfeld being publicly associated with their synagogue? Hmmm.

"The Synagogue mentioned above is top-heavy with the rich and powerful and has much to do with other synagogues that are just as stacked with talent. Do you think that it is beyond the realms of possibility that some of those people might have helped out a prominent fellow member who had made a "mistake"?"

The 'realms of possibility' are a long way removed from relevant evidence whether it's the synagogue or your 'very prominent Anglican Church school in Brisbane' .

Should the public overlook Einfeld's misdemeanour in consideration of his good works? Normally yes, however, when confronted with the allegation that he had submitted additional false statutory declarations in the past, naming overseas drivers on receiving speeding and other traffic fines, he said these too were mistakes, never deliberate lies.

Clearly the gentleman is a recidivist liar. This is a trait of egomaniacs who believe they can lie with impunity, unhumbled by exposure and imbued with the conviction that they are above the law. What other "misdemeanours" has the judge committed, of which we are unaware?

Sadly the man is 68 years old and I believe, suffering prostate cancer, nevertheless, justice has been served.