Dear Belly,

When I worked in the Sydney CBD, I was well placed to see the regular cerimonies occuring at The Cenotaph. When the parliamentary and military officials would arrive, the limos dropped them of at the bottom of Martin Place at George Street and then left, re-entering the traffic. There was one exception, though. The the Police Commissioner's car would illegally park in George Street, just a few steps back from Martin Place [otherwise would have been in a pedestian crossing] and sit and wait for the Police Officer, during the ceremonies.

Back in the days of Darryl and Ozzie, it would have made a pic, I think.

Peter the believer, sorry, I found your posts a little difficult to follow,(I'm no lawyer, or familiar with the Acts, or the language they're written in) I was only wondering if it was possible, not questioning your statements. What I had in mind was a civil(?) action to force the gov' to do the (morally)right thing, would it be possible, would it succeed?
Or would it even be binding on the slippery bugg(persons)?
If the answer was yes, how come it hasn't been done? The possibilities fascinate me!

Peter the Believer wrote:

"Jews hate juries."

Dear Peter the Believer,

What is your evidence for that statement?

Spikey not so Spikey please, I am unlikely to bag some one without reason.
Einfeld let me down, he let every one who followed his career down.
Most expect far more from such as he, to defend him because of his actions, the ones you like, but not judge him on these is cute.
You can not get away from the fact he now forever will be remembered for his faults not good deeds , only he is to blame for that.
In a forum such as this no crime is committed in holding such a discussion, or holding views different than our own.
Not to do so in case we offend some one, to hide our opinions is a crime against freedom of speech.

Talk about 6 deg of separation.The lawyer who defended Einfield I had been to school with for 10 yrs.There is a price for money and fame which many of us plebs fail to realise.I would not swap palaces for Einfield or his lawyer.

I have been asked for two answers. Firstly the evidence that Jews hate juries is contained in Julius Stone’s Book, Human Law and Human Justice, (1965) where he documents the history of Jewish Law, and the one mention of juries in it, is from Lord Devlin. He described the English jury as: a unique institution……to enable justice to go beyond even the point to which the law can be stretched.

We are governed by Jewish Law in Australia today. By the age of 14 a Jewish boy is supposed to know his Talmud. Many grow up to be lawyers, and have no compunction about imposing their will on their fellow man. They are Jews because they absolutely refuse to believe in Jesus Christ. They refuse to accept that in Genesis 49 Verse 10, God teaches that the law is vested in Judah. They refuse to accept that God promised a Ruler in Isaiah 9 verse 6, and that ruler was to be Jesus Christ. God confounded them because instead of sending a hateful vengeful leader, He sent a loving one. They wanted the Romans overturned, and instead the Romans offered Jesus citizenship.

A Christian cannot judge another Christian, but a Jew can. A Jewish man cannot accept any authority is higher than himself, and has a lot in common with atheists. That is Einfeld’s ultimate folly, and he has time to reflect. A Jew cannot deliver justice, only the institution distilled from the Gospels, called a jury can. In Exodus 32 the Jews invented a false God. They have persuaded Australia to create hundreds of them and called them Judges and Magistrates. No matter what religion they follow, they are all practicing Jewish law. Justice is a Royal prerogative, and the ultimate Royal is Almighty God.

You see Jewish law is tribal law and all about Rules. The twelve tribes of Israel were dominated by the tribe of Judah. When Jesus came he superseded Judah, and the English Coat of Arms, that used to adorn all Statute Law, had a little Lion of Judah on the top