The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Germaine's 'Boy' & Feminism's Fundamental Test

Germaine's 'Boy' & Feminism's Fundamental Test

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
So unfortunately you have simply confirmed my statement [agreeing with Mark Latham] that most Oz men [especially those in control] are just a congo line of PC suckarses

you have been sucked in by the ragarse in the Mall red herring and have chosen to be oblivious to the HUGE pedophile industry out there who prove that "pedophilia is a rich man's sport"

Greer is simply amusement value in this but is also a red herring, much the same as the ragarse "going upskirt", going forward, at the end of the day, towards closure

Understand?? - if not ask Peter Holier-than-though the protector of the Anglican pedophiles [who don't hold a candle to them Carflicks] who went bottoms up [no pun intented] as GG
Posted by Divorce Doctor, Sunday, 26 November 2006 11:53:29 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Just a little history for you guys.

Some Forty years, or so ago a naive young girl graduated from an Australian Catholic convent to enter university. This kids name was Germaine Greer .

In those days catholic convents, teaching girls senior years, existed for only three reasons.
The first was Archbishop Mannix’s finishing school. A factory to turn out suitable wives for pollies, diplomats, and industry captains.

The second reason was to keep any girls, who were already too keen on boys, well away from them .

The final reason was as a breeding ground for the next generation of nuns.

At a sexual level these schools were not just non sexual. They were anti sexual.

This was the world that this child, by the name of Germaine Greer left to enter university.

This was the seed of the womens lib movement which re started at the time.

This movement was something that Greer, often unintentionally, milked, getting credit for advances that she had little or nothing to do with.

The sexual repression however was something that Greer vigorously rebelled against.

But there was still no way that she could go through her convent upbringing without being influenced by it. On the campus she was shocked to hear young men discussing their sex lives as casually as they discussed the footy scores.

This led Greer to come barging blindly out with one of the worst pieces of misinformation that has ever dogged, and destroyed relationships for the past half century.

“Men are a bunch of slaves to their penises and are after nothing from a relationship but a semen spittoon.”

Now any teenage kid, who is young, stupid, and thinks they know the ways of the world , will regularly drop these clangers.

But for some inexplicable reason, several generations of women, with a thousand times the sexual savvy as the young Greer, have blindly swallowed this particular “penis slaves” blunder, hook line and sinker.

The voice that declared men a bunch of penis slaves wasn’t the voice of a feminist at all. It was the voice of a nun.
Posted by sparticusss, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 5:53:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hey, Channel 7 is doing "downshirting" on the gals at Oz Open

anyone see Our Alicia throw a hairy eyball at cameraperson
Posted by Divorce Doctor, Friday, 19 January 2007 2:05:54 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy