Yes, Daggett, I'd agree that there are certainly inconsistencies. But they are not restricted to CJ Morgan (Christopher?). I think that most contributors generally try to comply with the rules and behave in a civilised fashion.

PALE, my point exactly, you have proved me right. Certainly those people posted on occasions in their own names. But so did you post in their names, that is crystal clear from the writing style/s. Nor did anyone make any comment about "the dead", just about a slaughterhouse website.

Since you don't know who anyone is, you cannot possibly know what they do in animal welfare. People "hide out" as you so quaintly put it, because they do not want to be harassed to death by PALE, and there is plenty of evidence in old threads of such behaviour.

No-one is critical of RSPCA Queensland either. I and others have, and will, quite rightly criticise RSPCA branches where we believe that that it has failed in its statutory duties; that is our opinion and we have the right to express it. Every such organisation is subject to public opinion and criticism, and that is something you use against others viciously and relentlessly, despite the fact that they have "runs on the board" and you don't.

So please get over the notion that you have been singled out because you (claim to be, and maybe in the distant past you were) associated with RSPCA Queensland. If you are singled out it is because of your vilification of everyone else involved in the animal welfare movement - that is, your behaviour. You also claim to have broken your "MoU with Muslim leaders" yourself some time ago.

So please spare us the pretence of PALE complying with OLO rules. You yourself have posted in multiple identities for years. You have also named, without proof, any number of perfectly innocent people several times who, so far as I know, are not contributors to these threads, and that is hopelessly unethical and breaches the privacy rules.

Nicky

Forrest Gumpp: << ... I may have been unduly unkind to CJ Morgan (aka the Lord Dymo, the wizard Morgan, Christopher, and other unkind names without number) earlier in this thread... >>

Fear not, dear Forrest. I thoroughly enjoy every one of your missives, even those that chide me. I've never detected any malice, and I'll refrain from commenting on potential perceptions of pomposity (if only because it's far too alliterative).

After all, life is like a box of chocolates...

And I agree about the satire.

*Since you don't know who anyone is,= *Wrong

Dont embarress youreslves in court. Could be shattering + expensive.

Given a moment, I will post the muliply Ids that used on OLO. Busy with fire now( as you should be)

Here`s a way out for you lot, to save face and consider the other OLO users and GY.

You agree 'never' to address or refer to Pale again and we likewise.

Hows that?

Nick Said-
No-one is critical of RSPCA Queensland either.
I see then explain this-

http://www.animalactivism.org/campaigns/rspca-cruelty/
Here is A national Press Conference dedicated to people like you and your friends.
http://www.livexports.com/hughwirth.html

To the best my memory serves me these are a few more comments from you Nicky. Most of your posts starts with Pale or bagging RSPCA.=

1 What sort of "organization" is PALE? Not one to do with animal welfare, honesty, accountability and transparency, obviously.
( BTW thats ones suable- called defamation)

2Only last week it was revealed that RSPCA NSW is under investigation over just that issue.

3The RSPCA is at odds in some states with the REAL animal advocates because it fails in its statutory duty.

4If the RSPCA wants to be associated with PALE, does it also want to be seen to be profiteering from slaughterhouses? Probably. It seems to have no problem ignoring appalling abuses on pig, battery hen and broiler farms. Come to think of, it, nor does PALE. Nor does it bother attending live export ship loadings to enforce State legislation .

5 Maybe PALE&IF should change it`s name to PATCOB (People against throwing children off bridges) in "jabberwockish-speak"

6 RSPCA NSW is currently under investigation for paying its board members legal fees to undertake its prosecutions (internal corruption). It also receives royalties from one of the worst battery egg farming operations in the country. RSPCA WA has two farmers on its State Council who sell animals to the live export trade

Many more and far worse.

So hows that deal looking Nicky?

Best make it snappy.

Put your energy into helping in Victoria

PLS

PALE, do run away get some proper legal advice, because you certainly aren't getting it now. Defamation legislation has been largely standardised in recent times across states and territories (fundamentally based on the NSW legislation). While no-one I know takes any of PALE's comments seriously enough to action them, here's some free advice for you for the future:

"A communication that is insulting, annoying, false or damaging to someone’s business doesn’t meant that it is necessarily defamatory.

Defences include:

1. Honest opinion (previously known as fair comment)
2. Justification/Truth
3. Qualified privilege (where the publisher believes s/he has a moral duty to publish the information)"

Clear enough for you?

Reference to RSPCA NSW investigation:

http://sl.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/agribusiness-and-general/general/rspca-investigated-over-inhouse-legals/1414523.aspx

But do go and try and sue FarmOnline.

I do not provide material for AAQ's website; they are free to do that themselves (but you misrepresent it, once again, as current information when you know that it was posted there some time ago). Nor was it I who posted the comment about people throwing children off bridges (indulge me - in what way do you believe THAT was actionable?)

No-one on these fora, so far as I have seen, has criticised RSPCA Queensland. Certainly there has been criticism in other areas. Would you like a copy of the transcript of "A Blind Eye" (You could try suing the ABC, although you are out of time for that)?

And how often do you need to be told how little Hugh Wirth's opinion of other organisations matters? He is free to make any comment he chooses, even if it did make look like an idiot. Once again - old news, with you misrepresenting it as something new. But he can't be totally inept, did he not also fail to fall into PALE's traps for the unwary?

Finally, I will continue to write what I want to write, when I want to write it.

Now do run away and do whatever it is you claim to be doing "for Victoria". You are so behind with all other relevant information, I'm surprised you've even heard about it.

Nicky

No point dragging himself further. Forrest had only water within miles.
He knew he’d starve regardless. Even if people wanted to help surviving animals, trucks couldn’t get through with hay. It had been declared a crime scene.

Yabby was glad people came first. He prayed the children who play with him were safe from the fire. He smiled thinking of his friends. He still had the footage of other farm Animals who`d been sent to ME in the ships. The footage they snuck out together, tucked in his blackened coat. He was glad the Muslim Leaders Of Australia had exposed the Governments lies with this-

http://www.livexports.com/afic.html
But he needed someone to follow up on charges with this-
http://www.livexports.com/cowgun.html

He wished there was someone to give it to. He counted his blessing remembering the farmer where he was sent his stock to local abattoirs. But he worried about the others who were not so lucky. He still had nightmare recalling what they did to Bogart his friend the Camel and Millions of Others on the ships.

He turned his head and looked back to the Forrest for one last time. Forest was watching him. He held curious look.. High brow which mammy had always said was a sign of being smart, and a receding hair line:)

Forrest bent down and his hand was on a big rock. Yabby thought he was going to be stoned to death like so many of his family and friends in ME. But instead his grabbed this-

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=TzyPOy1rIJk

Suddenly he was before him with water in his hat. Little Yabbys legs were trembling.
Was it possible after all Forrest cared about cruelty to his friends. Was he wrong about Forrest . He was slipping into darkness now as he was carried away.

Yabby didn’t know what tomorrow would bring or if he`d live but he somehow felt better knowing someone cared about the animals that most don’t worry too much about.

Gosh. What are they drinking and smoking?

Nicky