The Forum > General Discussion > Why we are, as we are
Why we are, as we are
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 7:44:34 PM
| |
UOG, given your posts, I don't need to say anything lol, you are
busy digging your own hole. *i make the correction that you claim to now be* I never did claim to be anything else then what I am, so the mistake is yours. "Now" has nothing to do with it. You simply confused myself and Belly. There you go UOG, your own mind is playing tricks on you. *...i spit upon nobel and his death-'prize'* Now now UOG, that is not very civilised. Camels, alpacas etc spit. Perhaps that dna relationship is closer then you think :) Fact is that you have no evidence to show that evolution theory is wrong, or you would claim the money. *could you concieve something bigger /better than yourself,you could concieve god, * Well god if he exists, is free to write the rules on the face of the moon, for all to see. He has never bothered. Meantime we are stuck with religous nuts, squabbling amongst themselves about which holy book is really holy or not so holy. Most simply believe what they were taught as children, as the evidence shows. *in times past people like you swallowed the flat/earth theory,it was [people that ask questions ;that dare swim against public-opinion is where i chose to be]* Absolutaly not! The Catholic Church used to burn people like me lol. Even today in Islamic countries, people like me would be put to death for blasphemy. So much for free speech! I remind you that is was the bible which mentioned the 4 corners of the earth, not Galileo the scientist. *you have not got faulsifyable proof of evolution live with it* On the contrary, the global scientific movement, based on the evidence available, accepts evolution theory as fact. That is exactly what the US courtcase was about. ID and other dogma were shown to be no more then religious dogma, based on faith. What is taught as science is based on the available evidence. Anyone can challenge that evidence, including you. But it seems that you would rather go around spitting. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 11:16:14 PM
| |
look at you..[so clever yet cant name your proof]
did you look at the mountain of proof about god in the same ignorant way...[why dont you educate your-self about god?]..you cast bold statements about mountains of evidence yet can fill in any gaps between the species..[name one].. prove only one simple one[you claim relation to apes PROVE IT,..reveal your mountain of proof your so perfect yet cant name names if i make an error i correct it but your so sure yet cant present facts to prove your surity..[and ignore any i might present]..then might ask me to present it again in 350 words it is futile even talking to a closed mind but you have more quotes to respond to..why...because you dont have the ability to present any of your mountain of fact so go read the proof about god,..there are mountains of that as well read and rebut the links i allready provided..[you cant even update your mountain as new evidence in your own mind..the 99 percent ape is old news..AND[wrong info] and wrong meands it cant still be used as 'evi-dense'..[humans are only 85 percent alike]..which human is 99% the same?...you would know this if you overcame your smugness and read the links i already posted we have 50 percent of the genes of a bannana..[your not only an ape-brain but more bannana than you would be aware of in your igno-rants present a pebble from your mountain oh ape breath what you call mountains i call padding...[so lazy children accept on face that evolutionary science is based on fact] speciation is proof of speciation none of it includes a single genus mutating into a new genus,the gaps are there,but to win a debate your prepared to paper[gloss over the gaps prove one trans genus gap my clever ape just one what genus evolved into what new genus you cant name one, failure to respond at law means the mountain upon which you claim to stand is revealed a lie,...its just a loose pile of spoil and you sir are a lier if;claiming it is solid rock Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 5:44:43 AM
| |
UOG, you are a slow learner you really are lol.
Your problem is that you won't accept how the world works, how society works, what is internationally accepted and implemented. So you fight your little one man battle against that world and it won't get you anywhere at all, as we can see. The proof for evolution theory is not in one web page, as your little MacDonalds simplistic mind might imagine. It is in the tens upon tens of thousands of scientific papers, published in scientific journals on a regular basis. Those journals are available for anyone to read, if they make the effort to get hold of them through their library. I have even won a court case, by doing exactly that and what was in those papers was accepted as fact by the courts. All that evidence, tens up tens of thousands of those papers, is the basis of what is taught globally in biology, in schools, universities etc. That evidence is used by companies to discover new drugs, find new cures for diseases, splice new genes into crops, the list is endless. It is our human understanding, documented and accepted. Anyone is free to challenge it and to prove their case, so far they have failed. Yes, we have a few religious nuts claiming it is all nonsense, but so far none have been able to prove their case. Yes there are also plenty of religious people who accept the evidence of evolution theory, for they also accept that so called holy books should not be taken literally as words of any god. Sorry sunshine, but that is how the world works. You can protest until the cows come home, it won't do you any good. You bog yourself down in your little picture and refuse to accept the big picture as it is. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 7:56:36 AM
| |
yabby>>problem is that you won't accept how the world
works..,how society'works'..,what is internationally accepted and implemented.>> that is a curious word'implemented'you..could explain how evolution is implimated? >>The proof for evolution theory..not in one web page,as your little'MacDonalds'..simplistic mind might imagine>> im not asking for you to reveal it all..[just fill-in one gap.] just say the ape that you claim relation into >>Those/journals are available for anyone to read,>>{LOL} mate im not subscribing to'quack/theory'journel's wanting 25 bucks for an article..would you do the same?..for a church of scientology saying we have proof>)...just give your cash?...if science has proof make it available for free,..or by synopsis of what proves what >>I have even won a court case,by doing exactly that and what was in those papers was accepted as fact by the courts<< name the court case[or name the topic it was about]if it was related to this topic reveal...yea or nea. >>All that evidence,tens up tens of thousands of those papers,is the basis of what is taught globally in biology,>>> allowing the glossing over of the holes[gaps]in the theory[you do know quality is more inportant than number? it is as i wrote previously..it is taught to children[with the promise it is fact[that we will[in time]..get the fact's..(LOL)..we we havnt >>That evidence is used by companies to;discover new drugs,find new cures for diseases,splice new genes into crops,the list is endless.>> oh so natural selection is applicable how egsactly?..evolution applieds to gmo?...HOW? evolution cures what disease?..via evolving the disease into what new genus or new cure ?..[either way reveal how genus changes/evolves into a new genus} http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=8283 >>It is our human understanding,documented and accepted.>>LOL,who='our'?<<Anyone?..is free to challenge it and to prove their case,>> mate i cant get at what they say is proof..so how can i challange their secret seems the same lawyer types that charge me 10 $ per page for trial transcripts..are running the same scam with evolution..PROOF..?..lol proof that cant be presented isnt proof..[same thing in court] lets ajourn this case because yabby/evolution hasnt presented any faulsifyable evidence to support its theory cheers eh Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 1:37:10 PM
| |
*that is a curious word'implemented'you..could explain how evolution is implimated?*
Nope, not implanted lol, but implemented, it means put into practise. I even use it on my farm, when working out a strategy to deworm sheep. *just say the ape that you claim relation into* What about our ape cousins? Take a closer look. Much the same body parts, brain parts, nervous system, organs, blood etc. Even bonobos copulate in the missionary position, so perhaps that is where the missionaries learnt it :) You claim to have no relationship, despite all those similarities. Stop kidding yourself sunshine. *mate im not subscribing to'quack/theory'journel's wanting 25 bucks for an article..would you do the same?..* Well I have never paid for an article yet, but then I am not so silly as to source them online... *name the court case[or name the topic it was about]* It was about crayfish and their evolution and their imports into Europe. It was about comparing US, EU and AU crayfish and how they are affected by diseases, due to evolutionary factors. *it is taught to children* It is taught to biology graduates, who study for years. *evolution applieds to gmo?...HOW?* For instance, if you are looking for Glyphosate resistance, spot the mutant from the billions. Transfer that particular gene into crops and you have GMO. *mate i cant get at what they say is proof..so how can i challange their secret* That is because you have never bothered to attend a university. Their libararies subscribe to most of the major journals, students have free access to the information. Surely you know somebody who attends a university, who can access for you, whatever you like. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 2:28:51 PM
|
most of it still stands [and i corrected it before you did] god works in mysterious ways [ways you will never understand[and like evolution in ways you cant explain]
the fact remains it is up to you to prove your science [and in many posts you havnt [your usual reply is hit and run] revieuing your previous posts was very revealing in disclosing this
anyhow i know you will make a big issue about the error and will draw inferances about it [thus neatly not responding or proving evolution yet again]but know that i will
you have not got faulsifyable proof of evolution
live with it