The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Building censorship

Building censorship

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
I used to live at Lota - right beside Manly and Wynnum - and you'll find that more than likely this RETARDED paedophile crock is more of a smokescreen for them not wanting altitude development to keep their little slice of paradise worth more. Development like that makes an area less exclusive.

...and those are the sort of people in the area that have that frame of mind. It's like, 'I'm all right Jack, pull the ladder up'.

They're playing the guilt card.
Posted by StG, Friday, 12 December 2008 12:27:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Perhaps the architect should be charged for producing child porn.
Posted by Steel Mann, Friday, 12 December 2008 6:52:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I was thinking about the story last night. It struck me that Dannielle Gauld, the mother in the photo accompanying the story, must of be in a bit of a state.

She claims she is worried about paedophiles spying on her child from the upper floors of an apartment. Yet she poses for a photograph that includes a a closeup view of her young daughter. The photograph is now on the Internet for every paedophile in the world to ogle over.

What was she thinking?
Posted by rstuart, Friday, 12 December 2008 9:13:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Tsk! What's next?
Concerns that paedophiles might spot children during scenic helicopter flights?
Posted by Celivia, Friday, 12 December 2008 11:27:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have been playing with that rather silly line of thought I proposed earlier, and realised you can take it further.

So as before, we start by asking why, if the woman pictured in the story is so worried about paedophiles looking at her child, did she pose for a close up newspaper photograph with her daughter in front of her? And again we note the serious consequences of that decision - since every paedophile on the planet will be ogling her daughter over the internet, the poor little girl may be end up being scarred for life.

It is hard to come up with a charitable explanation. She is either just plain dumb, or she did it for personal gain. Either way if the woman truly believes her child is at risk from a society overrun with paedophiles and then exposes the child like that, she isn't fit to raise children. Someone should report the her to Queensland governments department of child safety.
Posted by rstuart, Friday, 12 December 2008 12:04:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Heehee rstuart that's right. I like your line of thoughts.
Her child would be far safer if she locked it away in a dark room under the stairs.
Posted by Celivia, Friday, 12 December 2008 1:13:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy