*Are women physically weaker than men?*

Steel,
Certainly by average women are physically weaker - agreed.

*psychological or mental differences?*

That is where women lead 'according' to research.

Yabby I made comment to your posts to Foxy which showed a man insulting a woman for no reason. She expressed surprise but I wasnt.
Regardless if its myself or any other female when you have no answer you stoop to personal attacks. Bottom line Yabby you WONT debate MLA AFIC Landmarks Elders AWB.
In general I think women still must work twice as yard as men to earn her place in many companies.

I might add that will be even harder now given introduction of maternity leave.
Many companies will hire men instead to avoid such payouts at a time we can least afford it.

Still that was all it was really about in the first place IMO. - employment figures.

So Yes woman are disadvantaged when it comes to job offers quite often. Still there are plenty of chances to get to the top for women who wait to marry and have children.

Fact is more men work to support a family than women do. Fact is many woman prefer to stay at home and have kids.
Fact is that is their business.

Again, none of your comments are addressing America or female Scientists.

*Yabby I made comment to your posts to Foxy which showed a man insulting a woman for no reason.*

Gertrude, which man insulted which woman? I certainly did not
insult Foxy, I simply stated a fact. Do you deny that some
women use sex as a way of obtaining a promotion?

*Bottom line Yabby you WONT debate MLA AFIC Landmarks Elders AWB.*

Bottom line is that Yabby spent friggin years debating this nonsense
on the animal welfare threads. The replies were a mumbo jumbo
mix of consiparcy theories and lack of reasoning. In the end Yabby
decided that it was a complete waste of time. More intelligent
posters on OLO, of which there are quite a few, are far more interesting to debate with.

*Again, none of your comments are addressing America or female Scientists.*

Reread my posts, they certainly addressed why men dominate in
Science and in business. So did many other posters. It is Gertrude
who tries to turn nearly every thread into an animal welfare thread.

I've told you before, your posts are frankly a waste of time and
a nuisance. I haven't seen too many on OLO who can make head or tail
of the majority of them. If they can, well great, debate with them,
but personally its not worth my bother

Yabby thats a lie.

Each time I raise MLA etc you either stop posting or divert back to your personal insults against woman to Nicky.

Now if you like I will go back and post some of the many examples.

Frankly Yabby you seem obsessed with sex. Why dont you open a thread about it.

Mean time I fail to see the connection regarding Scientists in America and whom sleeps with whom. . My only interest was in the title of the thread given our Animal Welfare work.


I don`t care to discuss men sleeping with woman or visa versa.

Your post to Foxy was quite crude. No gentleman would make such a comment to the lady.

Then again Foxy probably doesn`t know the other side of you.

Like when you chop the heads off of puppies with an axe

Glad to see intellectual rigour is still thriving on this forum.

Veronika,

What your views are on The 20 Brightest Scientists in America.

The word scientists in a title naturally is going to attract comments from Animal Welfare.

I was about to leave the thread after making a comment when I read saw posts to Foxy



Foxy has shown herself to be an informed poster polite with nothing bar utter regard to others.

I saw Yabbys comments to her as untrue, unkind and said so.

That said I will leave it you to offer more intellectual rigour.

PALE: "What your views are on The 20 Brightest Scientists in America."

I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.*

* NB: The views in question have to make some sort of sense.