>UOG said:
>"the better con
>is where to admit the con they would need to feel even more[moore]foolish than NOT to admit they we even conned in the first place"

So, let me see, what you're saying is there is a huge conspiracy to hide the REAL truth about abiogenisis and evolution? Thousands of scientists are participating in this conspiracy?

>UOG said:
>"age old promises that all will be proved[the gaps filled;so to speak],by decievers in their holy white coated garb,that mere believers in evil volutions >creationisms by natural?selectivity or faith]call believable specificity[but stangly just cobbled together randon assorted faCT]"

Wow, who could have known? That's a doozy if ever I heard one!
Holy garb, faith, believers...hmmmm reminds me of another deception that surrounds us LOL.

For your interest, here is a really interesting interview between Richard Dawkins and Father George Coyne.

Father Coyne is a well respected, extremely likable, rather controversial Catholic scientist, and I'm sure we've all heard of Richard Dawkins.

http://www.richarddawkins.net/article,3410,Richard-Dawkins-interviews-Father-George-Coyne,Richard-Dawkins-RichardDawkinsnet

trickkerdee>>So, let me see, what you're saying is there is a huge conspiracy to hide the REAL truth about abiogenisis and evolution?

no im not dee
im saying its not science proven

see that you are seeing a forest[as an in-peni-trait-able jungle
i use impenetratable because no one can explain it here, thus havnt bother explaining why this jumble proves the forrest has no trees between them

[thus this jungle of science fact[is in actuality individual trees ,the forrest is called evolution] but its just trees [just a fossil here THEN A GAP then the next tree [etc till we get a lot of facts that look like evolution but are in reality just eucalypts and banksias and tulips and moss and animals , bugs deer etc

but the theory of evolution says its all just chance [just evolution]
but there is gaps in the theory

if i wanted to bias the question i would list them

reveal the GAPS between the facts,so you can see the wonderfull diversity isnt evolution[NOT va complete faulsifiable forrest based on a theory,not a science [the trees]

but i see why im not able to reveal the gaps between the trees

your quote>>your calling the forest a place where Thousands of scientists are participating in this conspiracy?>>

no im saying see how the science experts have been turned into tree

they are fixated their tree is part of the truth
when only
what they know
is the truth

there presuming a forrest
but cant see the forrest for the trees

see the trees/science groups encompasing 'evolution' have gaps in between
thus these trees [scientists] cant join what they know together

there remains gaps in between those wonderfull fact's they enjoy studing[because they are seeing only the forrest they the miss seing its for-rest.]

trikkerdee
seen a bit of your vidio link
so whats your point?

dawkins is making a vidio about darwin[whom i love]

my notes from the vidio follow
note dawkins face visable[not the priests to see if the long statement dorkins made is reflected in the priests micro facial movements
note first question wasnt about darwin

priest states he represents ONLY hois vieuw as church HAS NO DOCTRINE conflicting with evolution

SO WHAT I DO im seeing gaps in this theory

the church quote>>evilution is no longer a mere hypothesis.. note he avoids the word theory
I DONT

Q>>best scientific explanation does nor conflict with catholic teaching>> yeah but he is a priest
he studied religion

[i studied evolution [with a passion] because i love darwin
he revealed to me the trickery of judging a book [evolution] by its cover

he taught me all finches ARE YET finches[possav#bly decendant from a finch parental genome[that had all the traits encompassed into its FINCH genes[i dont know the finch line but darwind finches branch off it]

pigeons have a line based on the line liva ,all pigions ancestor was the dove[domesticated from the blue barred rock dove

same with wolves all dogs decended from an ancestoral wolf line
cannis breed canis, liva breed liva , finches breed finches

please be more accurate
what im looking at that is proof?
[or your point is ?[re which movie ?
where in the movie ?
[is that proof of ambiogensis or evolution] for which i asked this question of those able only to see one tree as a whole forrest[or a theory as a science

This is the full uncut interview with Father George Coyne which was omitted from Richard Dawkins' television program "The Genius of Charles Darwin" for Channel 4 in the UK.

The link posted takes you to the first part of the video, and depending on your set up, each segment should just follow on.

It has been done in 7 x 10 minute segments.

Try to watch them all if you have the time.

My point in posting the link was my perception that some of the conversation between Dawkins and Coyne (Atheist and Theist) is very similar to the conversation we've been having here...and thought it interesting enough to share.

And no, it isn't proof of anything, just an interesting conversation between two intelligent men.

You may or may not agree OUG but I hope you do manage to watch it all.

trikkerQUOTE>>This is the full uncut interview<< in;7 parts[lol]

evolution can hardly be validated by a priest]bro i watched all of it i need[if it is your proof for evolution PLEASE STATE WHERE

[in which part of this'uncut 7 parts'movie of hawkins[not steven hawkins a brilliant scientist[but this pretender fooling people with his clever selective targeting of non authority]

i have debated the topic with the dickkkdorkins dude 3 times[he deleted his losing debates[listening to his spin is more tedious than you can imagine

you guys think this retard is god[he is the jesuschrist of athiests evolving their theory[he has no proof

[in half the tape i watched]he barely touched darwin at all

darwin is closer to god than dickkk dorkins ever could be,but darwin didnt exploiate the facts to suit his theory[he confirmed his evidences,and they together didnt make a science,only a theory[and still dont]

at least have him explaining something[not him editing himself to look clever[as i said i dont care what the church doctrine is]doctrine is no proof

i have no need for opinion
JUST THE FACTS[validate the theory]


im not watching movies so the next retard[who also cannot prove evolution,either]can make some other suggestion that i refused to see'the evidence'there is no evidence to be had from a priest[only his opinion]look how desperate you are even quoting the link twice[yet refusing to state what part is evidential]

if you think its all evidential [your dreaming]do you have a written transcript[the future gos-spell for lord dorkins neo-con bible]

please present WHERE on this movie is the revelation that proves the theory of genus evolving is a science,STATE WHICH TAPE HAS THE EVIDENCE[and where it is to be found?

if your unable or unwilling to be specific please make no claim it[that a movie]is any REAL proof[a movie isnt going to cut it]you want movies?here is some i commented on earlier.

http://au.youtube.com/profile?user=HighFlyingDutchman&view=videos

reveal where and in what movie you need me to look,darwin also insisted on a faulsifyable,i faulsified in one of these movies
but im not telling you where[two can play the trick er
eh dee