Christian rightists shouting kill him?

They wont the christians if they do.

Theres two sorts of christians in this world...1.those who appertain to being christians like many here in Australia because its a supposedly-called christian country

...and 2. those who are genuinely committed to Jesus Christ and do the following 4 things.

1.read/listen to their Bibles daily,
2.pray without ceasing,
3.fellowship with other christians on an ongoing basis
and 4. witness to the need to receive Jesus as Saviour to escape the final Judgment.

Lumping the name Christian onto just anyone... is a great fallacy!

JMCC wrote: And then I was watching TV as a southern fruitloop stated that Barack took his oath in the senate on the 'Koran'. Thank god I live in Oz (or was that Austria?).
how can these people claim to be the 'Leaders of the Free World'

Dear JMCC,

I seem to recall an Australian prime minister calling it a 'black armband view of history' in responding to a call for him to recognise what past Australian governments have done to the Aborigines. Apparently the US is about to elect a dark skinned man as president. I am very happy to be a citizen of Australia and the US and vote for Obama by absentee ballot.

When do you think Australia might have a prime minister who is not an Anglo-Celt?

I have no idea what Obama's beliefs are although one thing is very clear. The vast majority of the Secular press have a far greater dislike for Christians than they do Muslims. We see the hate constantly portrayed to those who identify with Christ. We have witnessed the lies, the deceit, the vindictiveness against a Sarah Palin because:
1. She professes to be a Christian
2. She is a woman and not a feminist
3. She is a mother
4. She calls killing the unborn its right name (murder)
5. She decided to give birth to a child with a disability rather than kill it.

Anyone of these points leads a large percentage of the press to demonize her. The press would be a lot friendlier if she was to wear a head scarf and claimed that the Americans were an evil race who needed to be taught a lesson.

runner, you're delusional. Do you really, really, honestly believe that if Sarah Palin were to don a turban and say such things, she would be treated kindly?

Seriously. Take a few deep breaths and have a lie down - and remember - not everybody's out to get the Christians, (though many think the more fundamentalist ones can look pretty stupid sometimes, and stupidity is always a worrying trait in people with power).

Sancho, you state: "It's going to be a great disappointment to current teenage fans of Tim LaHay when there's no anti-Christ, no second coming, and they're dying regular, ignoble deaths in 2100."

Regrettably, to believe such nutbaggery one has to be quite talented at making justifications. So, there's no doubt in my mind that they would just perform a few mental gymnastics and go right on believing as they have.

Polycarp wrote:

"Anyone can be and often is a 'tool of satan' to the extent that they actively oppose the message of Christ."

A bigoted Muslim could say, "Anyone can be and often is a 'tool of satan' to the extent that they actively oppose the message of Mohammed."

Both statements are repulsive messages of bigotry.

It is hate garbage to characterise a person as a 'tool of satan' because that person actively opposes any religious idea. People have a right to believe what they will, push any belief, resist any belief or have no religious beliefs at all. They have a right to do any of the foregoing without being demonised.

TRTL

'Sancho, you state: "It's going to be a great disappointment to current teenage fans of Tim LaHay when there's no anti-Christ, no second coming, and they're dying regular, ignoble deaths in 2100."

It seems the gw high priests such as Al Gore, Tim Flannery, Garnaut disagree with you.