The Forum > General Discussion > Some dog owners...make me...
Some dog owners...make me...
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
Posted by Fractelle, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 9:32:00 AM
| |
CJ Morgan “Now Col Rouge fantasises about "butchering" the dog whose owner he wasn't game enough to confront in an adult manner, just as Porky would rather kick a dog or skulk around a carpark than take appropriate actions.”
No fantasy however, I doubt any father, worth his salt, would do less, although I guess we likely have some exceptions here at OLO, You know – some pitbull, tearing at your child’s head, you calmly tell your child, don’t struggle, you will scare the dog and he is only reacting out of excitement, wait while I talk to the owner. In the mean time your kid’s life blood drains out of his body or he is permanently deformed through excessive tearing and ripping of cheek from head.. Yeah, Somehow, dog butchering seems a valid and reasonable option. Then CJ’s later post – too much excitement, a lot of whacking off going on Posted by Col Rouge, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 9:55:48 AM
| |
Col "The Dog Butcher" Rouge: << In the mean time your kid’s life blood drains out of his body or he is permanently deformed through excessive tearing and ripping of cheek from head.. >>
Nothing happened though, did it? Therefore it's a fantasy, i.e. it occurred entirely in your head. No blood, no deformity, no tearing, no ripping, no butchery. You've obviously been spending too much time in the company of a certain paranoiac bulldust-artist who shares your fear of dogs and people. Posted by CJ Morgan, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 10:27:41 AM
| |
The Polyboaz said it was "not a 'dog fight' intensity..nope..just 'chew'..", and describes an obviously friendly dog (though that didn't prevent him from giving in to his natural vindictiveness).
By the time we get to Col Rouge, the friendly labrador has turned into a slavering Cerberus, tearing the heads off children in public parks. If this mob can get so wound up over a retired guide dog, it's no wonder they confuse feeble terrorism with the apocalypse. Posted by Sancho, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 11:58:25 AM
| |
Veronika! I guess you have never seen an attack Labrador before? I think you should try and stay at my auntie's house. that's if you can get through the front gate.
The vet said, the dogs got a bad attitude problem and is suffering with a long history of mental illness. Again! The owner is responsible for the behavior of the animal and we all know some owner's are not the best in the treatment of there pets. Do we have any postmen here? My aunty has to go down town to collect her mail. The postman will not deliver. EVO Posted by EVO, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 3:31:48 PM
| |
Well... more evidence that there is nothing like a good 'dog' story to polarize a group of people :)
For Pericles benefit.. I should do this on a separate thread .. but hey.. his attention is here. I can't be bothered trying to defend myself from your ignorance based attack about associating "all" of 'them' with the verses I cite. I have maintained a consistent line thoughout of making a separation between the actual teaching of the faith and the behavior of it's adherents. The behavior follows a bell curve from radical to lazy and all the nominals in between. I referred you and others to the information from Harris Rafiq where it is clearly stated that around 15-20% of the community in the UK lay at the 'radical' end. I don't need to defend myself.. the totality of my offerings speaks for itself. What you are doing here P (I'm tempted to sic that Labby on ya.. "go BOY.. GET IM"....) is simply re-stating your own warped and baseless understanding of what I do. The Socialist Alternative mob are now claiming that their RMIT 'protest' is picking up momentum and there will be blockades in the CBD .. I'd love to see that. (See the last paragraph) http://www.sa.org.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1737&Itemid=1 SANCHO.. at least 'this' time your not advocating I get 'bashed' :) No mate..it was not being friendly.. if you had read all that I said you would realize this. Claiming it was 'friendly' is a ploy to position me as 'bad guy' ..but I'm afraid that incorrect presuppositions lead to equally incorrect conclusions. How in the world you get 'obviously' friendly from my posts which clearly differentiated between the OTHER 'obviously' friendly ones and this one is stunning. I know a tail wagging ears flat happy doggy when I see one. I also used to wrestle with my pointer, and know what 'mouthing' is.......This one was not it. I think as Evo points out it is mentally damaged.. probably from abuse by the owner. Posted by Polycarp, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 4:58:16 PM
|
You were not truly savaged by a labrador or any type of dog were you?
Rhetorical question, Polly. I know not to expect honesty from you. You are trying to cover up your mistakes, yet again.