Evo - I think you've strayed just a tad too far out of the circle this time...and found yourself on the wrong thread.

Yes Romany, how right you are.

EVO

My mistake! sorry.

EVO

*AAah PALE.. RSPCA... I've been the victim of vexatious allegations before.*

David Boaz I bet you have. Your right on one thing RSPCA DONT repond to all calls.
That alone tells me there was more to the bigger picture.

Personally David if I were 'totally convinced' of this actually happening you might get the biggest shock.

There is a part of me however that thinks it possible the dog in the park didnt even happen TBO.

I have noticed your posts rushing into animal threads demading in capital letters and complaining about more posts on Animal Welfare threads than others.

Your hell bent on being the centre of attention David .

Your posts on Muslims tells us that. Of course then when someone asks you a sensible question- Such us what Muslim People do you know living in Australia? + Would you like to meet some of these people instead of posting off shore stuff you run a mile.

My thoughts are by paying this thread anymore attention we are giving you exacly what you want.

That is to have everybodies attention- 'Isnt it David'

Exciting isn't it :)

Poor Evo jumps in with hob nail work boots.... only to realize he is in the wrong thread..but I read ur post anyway evo..and I assume it was connected to Gibo's thread?

CJ is in good form.. nice to see. Bugsy is being lazy..he can do much better at vilifying me :)

Pale is annoyed that I'm getting 'attention' :) cheer up mate.. it's all good.. we have learnt some important lessons.. including me...the newspaper was the best bit I reckon. (thanx Nicky)

Pericles got his wish :) now he's also happy..

Mmmmmm the world is in balance at last.....

Yabby's claws are working well on Nicky *ouch* :)

and dear Romany.. not unusually.. said things which have zero to do with the subject.. onya Romany *grin* (kidding ok)

Have a nice day all.

Sorry, Boaz, I can't let you get away with that, I'm afraid.

(and yes, Nicky, Boaz and Polycarp are indeed one and the same. Explains a lot, does it not?)

>>PERICLES please adjust your terminology "Whack Islam" is the correct term<<

You know, Boaz, it certainly could be that way, if you wanted it to be.

It could also be "whack-a-terrorist", if you felt so inclined.

But your actions - as so often is the case - belie any such positioning.

The reason is painfully obvious to anyone who reads your posts on the topic.

Whenever - and this happens frequently - anyone points out to you that you should not make a connection between Islamic terrorist activity and normal peaceful Muslims, you reply that the two are inseparable. No Muslim can avoid, you tell us, being implicated in the meaning of the one or two verses that you pull out to demonstrate that every Muslim must, by definition, want to destroy Christendom. Or Jewry. Or apostates. Or whatever interpretation you put on it.

We give you every chance, Boaz, to distance yourself from your "whack-a-mozzie" antics. We ask you, every time, to make it clear that you are not accusing every Muslim of being a terrorist, or potential terrorist.

That you continually decline to do so, speaks volumes about your character and purpose.

And gives the absolute lie to:

>>PERICLES please adjust your terminology "Whack Islam" is the correct term<<

If you want us to believe that, Boaz, you are going to have to try a lot, lot harder.