The Forum > General Discussion > Should public hospital authorities be prevented from placing Gideons Bibles by patients' bedsides?
Should public hospital authorities be prevented from placing Gideons Bibles by patients' bedsides?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
By the standards of today, the Yahweh of Amos is a depressingly psychopathic tyrant, although I understand the intent of Amos (as with most prophets) to try to stir up a bit of social reform by appealing to his countrymen’s traditional relationship or covenant with their old war god. I’m always happy to try to find the good and interesting or the funny or insightful in the bible (or any other text): I love the beautiful language and mythology of Genesis, and much of the philosophy in Paul, or the elegant blend of myth, legend, liturgy and moral teaching as Matthew tries to link the old and new during the disastrous 8th decade CE of Judeo-Christian history. Even Deuteronomy provides an interesting historical record of the central idea (that of the Covenant) of this ancient temple state.
But I don’t quite understand how you can see Amos as a good read, especially for someone in a hospital bed who might not be feeling too well to start with. An interesting account of the mass psychosis of a particular ancient people at a particular time, sure, (or perhaps the personal madness of an individual), but I think the skeptic’s annotated bible sums it up pretty well: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/am/good_list.html.
As for the Genealogies in 1 Chronicles, I’m afraid you’ve lost me completely there. You might have to be a bit less obscure.
I have to admit, though, that I'm a bit wary of encouraging you in this way: I suspect my atheist-humanist mind is going to struggle to make any sense whatsoever of your christian-evangelist one! My snouty curiosity has overwhelmed me, however.