Here is a joke for you all. If you take three men and three women and tell them to urinate in a round room, what happens?

Answer! Nothing. Cause the room is filled with people and there's now-where to hide.

Yes! Iam not to good at humor.lol

Dear evolution,

I liked the joke.

We need to laugh more.

Take care.

Ginx > "For crying out loud!...'harmful to democracy'..! What bloody next is going to be "harmful to democracy"!.!.!.!"

You have to quiet down for a second. You are obviously not reading my comment (or any other articles and discussions) or thinking about it. Women do not need feminism (the federal office for women, the federal minister for women's interests, the endless organisations and academia). Discrimination, harrasment, and so on are all issues that affect both genders and can be dealt with on that generic basis. But this is not the whole problem. The way it harms democracy, is when laws start being changed to suit one gender (women) over another (men). And that is what has happened, to the point in which lies propogate in the media, fuelling even more distortion.

"YOU trying popping a kid from between your legs, and YOU might deserve some equal measure of respect)! Women have well and truly earned the rights to equality with men."

That's moronic. Your basis for women's 'equality' is that they give birth? Did you know that they are biologically designed to? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female#Mammalian_female

Antiseptic:"If left unchecked, it will be significantly greater a problem for men than the patriarchal situatio you describe was for women because of one simple fact: women control the womb."

Ginx:"I acknowledge and respect the struggle women have had over the years to gain their rightful place in society (Yeah! I said RIGHTFUL. YOU trying popping a kid from between your legs, and YOU might deserve some equal measure of respect)! Women have well and truly earned the rights to equality with men."

Thank you for confirming my point.

Anti/Steel: has it ever occurred to either of you that you are both classic instigators of rampant feminism?

I have truly done my damnedest to see things from both perspectives, but trying to make you two see what I'm getting at, is like trying to push a boulder up a hill with my nose!!

You-have-both-missed-the-point-because-you-chose-to...

I have got to be somewhere else pronto;-so I will explain more fully to you in s-i-m-p-l-e language when I get back, so that you can grasp things. That is,-if you require me to do so..?

Oh;..and one more thing. I don't feel the need to turn all girly girly, sugar and spice to communicate with prats like you two.

I will leave that to others...

The point is the existence of the double-standard
in the society as a whole.
All the 'excuses' which have been cited
are excuses which would not be acceptable
if the sex roles were reversed, etc.

Individuals involved in this conversation
may well have balanced views themselves
that was not my complaint
it was not even a complaint about Prof Doherty
it was the different way society as a whole
treats those types of comments
when they are made about the male sex
and those types of comments
when they are made about the female sex

Camille Paglia remember received death threats
and letter bombs
I dont think Prof Doherty is in any danger