The Forum > General Discussion > Do women need to be more covered?
Do women need to be more covered?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
'Women can be wearing a sack and if a man is of low character he will find a way to sexualize it or sexualize the woman and/or attempt to degrade her. '
Surely you aren't equating looking at a woman who chooses to reveal parts of her body with the above? From your stories you seem to come into contact with some rather strange men. I see this term 'sexualizing' women a lot. I don't get it to be honest, I think women are sexual beings. How can a man 'sexualize' a woman?
I also think if you don't want someone to see your clevage, don't show it. If you do want people to see it, and why not?, don't complain when people look. That's all I'm saying and I feel people are getting the wrong idea.
Ginx, Fractelle,
I for one love to look at what ever parts of their body women are willing to show. All I resent is being castigated by women for looking. It has nothing to do with blaming women for getting me 'all worked up'. Who doesn't want to be all worked up anyway:-)