The Forum > General Discussion > Do women need to be more covered?
Do women need to be more covered?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
Posted by Usual Suspect, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 1:13:16 PM
| |
I know what we can do gentlemen, so it isn't a problem for you:.....
Let's put women in a full flowing gown with only eye holes. BRILLIANT! You'd have nothing to complain about then..................;-or would you? Posted by Ginx, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 1:53:06 PM
| |
Ginx
That's brilliant, I wonder why no-one has ever thought of it before, men's reaction to women is the woman's fault......hang-on a doggone minute, I think someone already has. Well that's the collective unconscious for you. And next season the new black is: http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/wda0331l.jpg It'll be a hit, pole-dancing will never be the same. Posted by Fractelle, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 2:14:31 PM
| |
What a hoot Fractelle!!
Posted by Ginx, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 2:17:50 PM
| |
Eye holes?!
Fractelle you saucy Jezebel, how dare you? Holes for eyes? Honestly, there's a mesh alternative so those scantily clad ocular organs aren't put on display where they're bound to get men all steamed up. Posted by TurnRightThenLeft, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 2:22:13 PM
| |
"If I, as a man, decided to wander around the office in a midriff shirt, or a fishnet vest, I would accept people will look at my exposed toreso. Yet I find so many women wear low cut tops and belt-skirts, and complain about men looking at their exposed flesh."
Women can be wearing a sack and if a man is of low character he will find a way to sexualize it or sexualize the woman and/or attempt to degrade her. I shared one story earlier and I will share another. One man I was acquainted with (I ate at his restaurant on occasion) saw me at the bus-stop one day waiting for the bus. When he saw a friend of mine the next day he told them I was a prostitute. When the man asked how did he know that he asked "Why else would she be waiting at the bus stop? And how else could she afford a Dolce & Gabbana phone"? Apparently if you do not drive a car in Los Angeles you must be a prostitute or stripper. Hmmm, maybe people do not want to spend $4.27 for gas? I share these stories to show how women are disrespected who DO cover themselves. The problem is not the attire, but the mentality of choice people. Posted by MsMerising, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 2:28:04 PM
|
'attitudes that place responsibility on women for causing lust , are inherently anti-woman'
I think you may be confusing the issue. Most men (apart from the religious) merely want women to take responsibility for their actions.
If I, as a man, decided to wander around the office in a midriff shirt, or a fishnet vest, I would accept people will look at my exposed toreso. Yet I find so many women wear low cut tops and belt-skirts, and complain about men looking at their exposed flesh.
As a man, when a woman leans over your desk with an extremely low cut top, virtually shoving her breasts in your face, if you look you're guilty of sexual harassment these days. I think if anything the guy is being sexually harassed.