The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Only in Australia!! This is interesting, what do olo readers think?

Only in Australia!! This is interesting, what do olo readers think?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. 24
  12. 25
  13. 26
  14. 27
  15. All
PALE&IF: << BTW why did you call me Wendy?
We are member institution with OLO – People against Live Exports.
PAL >>

So it's clearly the policy of this 'member institution' to post racist spam emails without attribution or apology, rather than the action of a particular racist individual displaying poor judgement.

I'm glad that's cleared up.
Posted by CJ Morgan, Sunday, 20 April 2008 9:49:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly said

PALE lets have a thread about live exports ...
Pale Replies
Umm, well providing we can mention the people who are making political donations then ok.


Belly I am not trying to be rude.

= Please think about what you said and understand 'the reason' for live animal exports is ' ONLY political'.

It is a labour State and federal Government.?

There is 'one industry 'being walked all over.

History tells us unions were a HUGE part of the reason live exports kicked off in the first place.

Sure, they saw the errors of their ways and we have tried to support them.

For a very long time we have worked with AMIUE


We have plenty of ALP buddies and of course a few enermies who are trying to go against RSPCA.

We have some libs and some Greens and a heap of others that all care about live exports.
We meet we eat drink and we talk . Nobody has 'ever said' I want to be a member and help the animals but we cant talk about the libs the greens or labour. They simply come as concerned people.

The Meat union have long rallied for live exports to be stopped.
Now they are being 'used' to stop the migrants coming in.

Now you want us to debate this without mentioning that the meat trade under this Government are the only ones having extreme demands put on them that dont exsist in other industries?


That putting us at an unfair advantage = but ok.

I dont tell you what to post and with respect you should not be trying to dicate to us either however if it makes you happy.

Open your thread belly and we will make an undertaking NOT to make personal comments about you in response to yours .

However if you take swipes at us personally as before we will respond. You know that already. Oh, I nearly forgot we wont talk about unions either.



We want skilled migrants to come in and work.
Cheers and have a good day.
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Sunday, 20 April 2008 10:36:17 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PALE&IF: "Graham Young deleted it and warned you"

Nope on both counts: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=989#18420. I'd like an apology, please. I'd also prefer you stopped offering me money to make me go away.

PALE&IF: "You don’t seem to understand you ARE responsible for what you say on a forum. "

On the contrary, I am fully aware of that fact and I have tried to draw your attention to it. You are the "organisation" that makes and then endorses racist postings, after all. While you're apologising to Graham for misrepresenting him, you can work on your post withdrawing the original remarks and apologising to the rest of the OLO community for the offence caused.

Are you beginning to understand the concept of being "responsible for what you say on a forum" yet?
Posted by Antiseptic, Sunday, 20 April 2008 11:23:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If this has rambled on (Cups has a point;-come back Cups all is forgiven!!),-it's because we have all assisted PALEIF to bob and weave and put a good distance between themselves and their daft and erroneous original post.

I really cracked up at this:-

"I am privy with further information as to certain funds that were in need of a closer eye." (Gertie/Thel/Lou).

Fair go;- what do you expect with this kind of eloquence?

PALEIF: DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR ERROR IN PUTTING YOUR ORIGINAL POST UP? DO YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS DIRGE WAS MANUFACTURED TO FUEL THE ANTI-REFUGEE FIRES?

Now, don't feck around gels; just answer a DIRECT coupla questions-DIRECTLY.

No guts no glory.......?
Posted by Ginx, Sunday, 20 April 2008 1:41:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Firstly I would like to go into bat for PALE. Although I cant think of a time I have read anything of PALE’s I have agreed with (I have not read all of his/her posts) I have to say that the people here who have accused PALE of being racist are are only showing there own prejudices towards anybody who would dare to post something that is critical of a minority. If you read PALE first post on this thread you will see that he/she posted an email (obvious to most of us that it was spam but not to PALE) and merely asked peoples opinions on it! Remember the heading “Only in Australia! This is interesting what do OLO readers think” No suggestion that PALE agreed or disagreed with the email. Sure PALE looks as silly as somebody who falls for a Nigerian scam but those who branded PALE a racist before he/she had the chance to put forward his views on whether or not they agreed or disagreed with the email are just as foolish.

Also I would like to make an overall comment about how deluded some people are who have posted on this thread. Those who have branded me a racist (cliché) because they cant find any holes in my argument and because I refuse to support their do-gooder politically correct agenda are merely showing the same sort of dogmatism that Boaz_David shows when it comes to religion. Sure some ill educated dogmatic people seem to think that these refugee are some sort of gift from the gods and the more the merrier. And if anybody points out the stupidity of their line of thought that person must be some sort of demented misanthrope. The narrative you people have left on this thread shows that you are all dogmatism and no substance. The paucity of evidence for refugee and the plethora of evidence against refugee coming to Australia is testimony to that.
Posted by EasyTimes, Sunday, 20 April 2008 1:54:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly – “EASY TIMES do you understand your words are here on display?
That they speak for you forever? the thread was a racist lie but your constant posting tells more about you than I think you wanted to.” Do you know that your words are here on display as well Belly? The only thing that your dogmatic stance proves is that you are incapable of looking out side the square and seeing the bigger picture. What I have said is all true (apart from a dig here and there and a windup or two. Cant help myself) what you have said is nothing but wishful thinking and pie in the sky mentality.

If I have said something that is incorrect Belly I am sure you would have picked me up on it already. This only leaves you and you friends in one position that being to share the stage of dogmatism with the religious fanatics and there crazy out look on the world. Like two peas in the pod!
Posted by EasyTimes, Sunday, 20 April 2008 2:00:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. 24
  12. 25
  13. 26
  14. 27
  15. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy