The Forum > General Discussion > What happened when GAY meant..joyous?
What happened when GAY meant..joyous?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
-
- All
Posted by Ditch, Saturday, 6 October 2007 8:49:23 PM
| |
SATAN!
Damn that felt good. :D Posted by CJ Morgan, Saturday, 6 October 2007 9:01:25 PM
| |
"If you have the gay problem you can get rid of it by going to The Lord." - Oh there is so much I could do with that.
I'm so tempted, I even looked up the Wikipedia reference to Necrophilia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necrophilia but it seem to be in bad taste to run with that interpretation of Gibo's suggestion. There are christains around who deserve better but then I've not noticed any attempting to pull Gibo into line. Those who enjoy a bit of bad taste can toy with that in the privacy of your own homes. I've spent time thinking about the merits of commenting on my sexual orientation but that seems to add little to the discussion. Maybe I'll just have to accept that Gibo has had a word from the Lord and take it as truth. I may have to consider myself outed as has Ditch. On the other hand it could be that I like others wish to stand up against oppression even when we are not the oppressed. Similar to christains of some time back who stood up against slavery despite not being slaves themselves. It could be that Gibo cannot understand those who would stand up for the freedoms of others and against oppression by those who hold an image of a sex fixated god dear to their hearts. As I read some of the latter posts I really am feeling quite gay (thats the happy, amused kind of gay). R0bert Posted by R0bert, Saturday, 6 October 2007 9:33:29 PM
| |
Allow me to respond on behalf of gibo:
Q) Anything. A) Go see god about it. Of course, it's not very helpful for actually solving problems, but hey. It must be nice to be able to respond to any given conundrum with - 'go to the lord'. Unfortunately it also means you can't actually communicate with these people, but hey. I guess that's our problem, not theirs. Posted by TurnRightThenLeft, Sunday, 7 October 2007 5:35:35 PM
| |
"Unfortunately it also means you can't actually communicate with these people, but hey. I guess that's our problem, not theirs"
Yes, and this is the problem, when all that is offered to any discussion is the same old, same old.........just change one or two words to relate minimally to the current topic and bingo, all is resolved. However, the problem isn't just for those who want to debate rather than preach as you say, it's Gibo's and others who reason his way. It's worth pointing out though that taking issue with Gibo and his ilk does not imply any lack of religiosity on the part of his critics. It is simply an objection to the constant, predictable line they take in refusing to discuss any topic outside of their narrow frame of reference. Posted by Ditch, Sunday, 7 October 2007 5:55:51 PM
| |
I don't know..(shaking shaking his head in utter disbelief)
It goes to show, one cannot,(or will not) discuss a topic without the influence of religion. At some stage in our lives, we have all asked the big guy upstairs, for some kind of moral boosting assistance, yet we never hear of those in a same sex affair, asking for help with their relationships. (which i'm pretty sure they do, we just don't hear it) Is it due to the complexity of the situation? or is it due to the bible condoning such activity? If the latter be the answer, then the big guy upstairs does not in fact, love his creations...oops..did I dare mention that? In that case, one had better watch his or her step whilst tripping gayly through a meadow full of sheep. Who was that guy holding a crook in the middle of a field anyhow? Posted by SPANKY, Sunday, 7 October 2007 6:24:33 PM
|
What's the first word that comes into your mind when reading the following words?
Penis
Vagina
Anus
Orgasm
Sperm
Cliteros
Testicles
Penetration
Cunnilingus
Fellatio
Blow job
How are you going so far? You should start to feel better very soon