The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Australian Outrage, Israeli War Crime.

Australian Outrage, Israeli War Crime.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. All
Israel's ambassador to 'check' possibility of paying reparations to Zomi Frankcom's family
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-21/israel-reparations-zomi-frankcom-gaza-idf-strike-death/107065204
Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 22 August 2026 5:19:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Paul,

Apparently the independent investigator hired by Penny Wong did not recommend charges.

https://youtu.be/C22Q0D3OG3Y?si=GZ580h7LYlogTET2

The story also shows a very different response to an Australian murdered on October 7.

Have you discussed Galit Carbone? Why be so enraged by one murder in the conflict and ignore another?
Posted by Fester, Saturday, 22 August 2026 5:57:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Fester,

I am disgusted by all the senseless murders in the world, not only that of Zomi Frankcom and six of her colleagues in Gaza.

"Apparently the independent investigator hired by Penny Wong did not recommend charges." He was refused access to vital evidence that the Zionists had in their possession. The Zionists did not recognise any "investigation" by Australia. Why do you seek to negate one atrocity by pointing out another, they don't neutralise each other out, they compound the total atrocities committed.

I'm sure if the evidence of the Holocaust had been withheld at the Nuremberg trials, maybe "innocent" Nazi's wouldn't have gone to the gallows.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 22 August 2026 7:12:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Fester asks: "Have you discussed Galit Carbone? "

We did way back in 2023. As I recall, people like Paul and AC couldn't change the subject quickly enough. You see, Fester, while all deaths are sad (according to Paul) only those involving the IDF are worth discussing and even if the evidence shows the IDF weren't to blame, they were....ahem...to blame.

_________________________________________________________________________

AC does a series of "Are you saying" questions where he shows either (1) his complete inability to understand the written word or (2) his desire to twist the facts in the cause of blaming the evil Joo.

"Are you saying 'Any Palestinian who doesn't support being exterminated is Hamas'?"

NO. and NO. I was showing a Gazan telling us the truth that every household in Gaza contains Hamas supporters. Just because you don't want that to be true doesn't make it false.

"are you saying 'The majority of the people of Gaza support the Israelis, "

NO and NO. I was talking about the family of the Zomi Frankcom. Do try to keep up.

"If America WAS bombing Australia"

Its pretty funny (and sad) that Paul and AC now regularly fantasise about Australia being bombed.

_____________________________________________________________________

Paul declares that there must be more evidence to support his fantasies. Australia conducts an inquiry. Australia accepts the inquiry. The family of the victims accept the inquiry. Then suddenly Paul decides that the inquiry wasn't hard enough on the evil Joo and there must be more evidence because he just wants there to be more evidence.
Posted by mhaze, Saturday, 22 August 2026 9:09:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Trumpster,

"there must be more evidence because he just wants there to be more evidence"
There was more evidence, incriminating audio evidence for the 90 minutes of unedited drone footage, which the Zionist refused to give to the Australian inquiry.

"As I (Trumpster) recall, people like Paul and AC couldn't change the subject quickly enough." Another lie from YOU.

"Australia accepts the inquiry. The family of the victims accept the inquiry."

Are YOU referring to the whitewash Zionist inquiry? The only one accepting that rubbish is the Zionist apologists, YOU!

BTW, you probably believe Martin Bryant would have been cleared of wrong doing, only if they hadn't mentioned Port Arthur at his trial.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 22 August 2026 9:28:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"incriminating audio evidence for the 90 minutes of unedited drone footage"

How do you know its incriminating? Have you heard it? No? Oh I get it....you just want it to be incriminating and in Paul-land wanting it to be true is the same as it being true. The audio wasn't released because it contain military information that would have been useful to the enemy.

"Are YOU referring to the whitewash Zionist inquiry?"

No I'm referring to the Australian inquiry that you are trying so very hard to pretend doesn't exist. The inquiry that the Australian government accepted. The inquiry that the Frankcom family accepted. The inquiry that the antisemites are trying so very hard to ignore.

"BTW, you probably believe Martin Bryant would have been cleared of wrong doing,"

Yet more evidence, if more evidence were required, that Paul's reversion to his childhood is continuing apace.
Posted by mhaze, Saturday, 22 August 2026 9:54:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy