"The account I use for those analyses belongs to a fictitious "Jow Blow"."

That's cute. JD thinks he can fool the AI!!

When you ask questions like "In the attached debate, is mhaze squirming?" the AI knows the answer you want and gives it. But you need comfort and flattering so you're good with that.

"I already knew that, mhaze."

Yeah. Sure. Just like you always knew the Irish were Celts. Tell yourself what you need to in order to salve a bruised ego JD, but don't expect me to buy your fabrications.

The AI gives links to actual studies explaining why the AI seeks to give the questioner the answer they want. JD. who's always going on about the data, suddenly wants to ignore the data.

Still, since this is JD's only way of trying to salvage some self-esteem when he has his butt handed to him, he'll continue doing it.

And I'll keep ignoring it.

AC raved: ""Jews will never accept Arabs as their own""

I gave specific facts disproving that. What does AC do when faced with actual facts? Ignores it and races to change the subject. Talking with AC is like trying to hold rancid custard in your fingers - its impossible because it has no substance.

You can keep ignoring them, mhaze, they're not for your benefit.

But they will keep coming and I will continue to be transparent throughout the process, neutral in my questioning, while inviting others (including yourself) to try it for themselves.

//That's cute. JD thinks he can fool the AI!!//

So, this is irrelevant.

Anyway, you still haven’t defined “ethnic entity.” You dropped that one like a hot potato, didn't you?

So, what are the criteria?

"while inviting others (including yourself) to try it for themselves."

I already know how to use it as I've just demonstrated. I also know its utterly invalid... and now so do you </grin>.

Seriously you treat these LLM as though they are independent arbiters. But they are just programmes trained to give the answer that most pleases the inquisitor. That's fine when asking for data or asking it to pull together large amounts of disparate information. But it utterly fails when you ask it to arbitrate discussions. (see above as Grok explained). I've been telling you this since you first started using the LLM to try to sooth your wounded pride.

You're like one of those teenage girls who falls in love with the chatbot and thinks its real. Its rather pathetic.

But you'll continue to use it even while knowing its utterly invalid, because you need to be flattered and soothed whenever you have your butt handed to you.

Quick says JD, this isn't going well....change the subject.
"Anyway, you still haven’t defined “ethnic entity.” "
Which of those words do you not understand?

mhaze,

You've written three paragraphs about AI and none defining "ethnic entity."

It's a straightforward question.

What are the criteria?

"You've written three paragraphs about AI "

But its so much fun pointing out your naivety and embarrassment. OTOH if you'd just own up we could move on.

Don't worry, I'll let you change the subject....eventually.