the same can't be said for YOU
Paul1405,
Lol but not in a funny context. Unlike you I care about this Nation ! Nor do I as you do have to resort to lying.

Paul1405,
Instead of playing Mr Racist why not offer some insight to this from your 50,000 sorry, 120,000 years now, heritage ?
I'm sure we'd all like to hear about all the farming & aeronautical experiments with bent wood on the edge of the continental shelf a few thousand years before the Egyptians worked out how to move heavy stone blocks.

Indy,

The racists here is YOU, have you forgotten that on learning I have some Aboriginal heritage you called me a "Concrete Jungle Bunny". This thread is another one that you started to "have a go" with your sarcasm at Aboriginal people. WHY, wont you say where you came from? Unlike aboriginal people who respected the environment, you turned yours into a sh!thole, so why not admit it!

"I'm sure we'd all like to hear about"...the disaster you and the rest of the animals caused back in the old country.

Paul1405,
As I told you before, there's no need to try so hard to convince us of your stupidity, we can all see that quite clearly !

Indy,

Your silence on your past, speaks loudly for what you are today!

I think that Paul1405 is Anglophobic and racist against white people and wants to see them pushed into the sea. The result's of MABO and other rulings apparently gives Aboriginal's 51% of the Australian mainland already, but they want more. The insatiable appetites of Economics. But Aboriginal's don't have an economy?

From DuckAI-
"Proponents of the 51% Figure

Activists and Advocacy Groups: Certain Indigenous rights activists and organizations may reference the 51% figure to emphasize the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal peoples and to advocate for land rights and reparations. This claim serves to highlight the need for greater acknowledgment of Indigenous sovereignty.

Public Figures and Politicians: Occasionally, some politicians or public figures may use the percentage to provoke discussion around land rights and to raise awareness about Indigenous issues, especially during debates on reconciliation and land justice.

Basis for the Claim

Historical Context: The figure often reflects widespread sentiment about the need to address land dispossession following colonization and the ongoing impacts of that history. It’s more of a rhetorical device than a quantifiable legal assertion.

Court Cases and Claims: Since the Mabo decision, various native title claims have been made, leading to a belief that substantial areas of land could be subject to Indigenous rights. As claims accumulate, the idea of a specific percentage has emerged in discussions but does not correspond to any recognized legal framework.

Societal Discussion: The figure may be invoked within surveys, discussions, and reports analyzing land ownership and Indigenous rights, however, these discussions often lack rigorous statistical backing and use the percentage as a form of advocacy rather than a legal assertion.

Conclusion

In essence, the 51% claim is championed more in activist circles and public discourse than within formal legal contexts, reflecting a desire for recognition and justice rather than a factual legal ruling. If exploring this issue further, understanding the historical and legal complexities of Indigenous land rights is crucial."