Not sure about this cartoon but sounds controversial Charlie Hebdo.
http://duckduckgo.com/?q=charlie+hebdo+cartoon+&iax=images&ia=images

Good to see the father charged. Perhaps if Western governments were not continually interfering with families, and driving a wedge between parents and children there would be fewer of these horrible events.

The Total State is dead set on ‘relieving’ families of looking after themselves: getting kids into brainwashing factories younger and younger. The Albanese government is after 3 year-olds now.

Children should be with their mothers until they are 5 years old or when they start school. They should be with their mothers and fathers as much as possible after that. Parenting is the job of parents, not the State.

ttbn- I've been looking into Carl Schmitt's- The Concept Of The Political, short book 50 pages or so, He seems to be very analytical and well respected even by Hebrew Leo Strauss and in spite of his membership in the Nazi party from 1933.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt

"He was an active jurist, a member of the Prussian State Council, and a professor in Berlin. In 1936 Schmitt was forced to resign his political role when the SS targeted him, but Hermann Göring protected him. After the Second World War ended, Schmitt spent over a year in an internment camp and returned to Plettenberg. He refused denazification, which barred him from academic positions. However, he continued his studies and frequently received scholarly visitors. In 1963, he published the Theory of the Partisan. Schmitt died on 7 April 1985 at the age of 96. "

"Schmitt provided a positive reference for Leo Strauss, and approved his work, which was instrumental in winning Strauss the scholarship funding that allowed him to leave Germany.[45] In turn, Strauss's critique and clarifications of The Concept of the Political led Schmitt to make significant emendations in its second edition. Writing to Schmitt during 1932, Strauss summarized Schmitt's political theology thus: "[B]ecause man is by nature evil, he therefore needs dominion. But dominion can be established, that is, men can be unified only in a unity against—against other men. Every association of men is necessarily a separation from other men… the political thus understood is not the constitutive principle of the state, of order, but a condition of the state."[46]"