CM

Some people seem to talk/think through their fundamental orifices; including anyone who would call Aristotle “arsethrottle”. How could anyone who would do that be taken seriously! There is no way you could “discuss” anything with a genius like that.

I suppose, though, it's something of a feat that they can talk out of said orifices with their heads stuck up them.

I don't know why people are worried about a fairly normal bloke like Peter Dutton instead of taking notice of what the raving lunatic Adam Bandt is saying. Bandt announced last Wednesday “the biggest campaigns in Greens history to win lower house seats”. He reckons that the Greens could win five seats, and share POWER with Labor.

Now, that's really scary. Bandt wants POWER.

Remember Gillard and the two middle of the road dimwits who aided and abetted her minority government?

Well, think about how a much further Left than Gillard Albanese minority government aided, and abetted by virtual communist Greens, would be.

Kudos Indydividual, ttbn. Bit of fun. I could have said more but it's not worth it.

When things come out of our orifices either our mouths or some other orifice it reflects on our family and colleagues. I suppose to those with their heads in their anuses the world looks fairly dark, but light can replace darkness with a pull of the neck, sometimes it looks fairly dark anyway, but it takes discipline and an understanding of virtue to create a world worth living in. I just hope that Paul1405's mother doesn't have to endure being kissed with that excrement. Not sure why she didn't better toilet train Paul1405.

Probably "Arsethrottle Paul" will fail to throttle his anus, and triple down, rather than take his lead foot off the pedal, but that's his choice.

Anyway, enough for now.

That a person deemed by some voters to be fit to serve in Parliament was stupid enough call the Leader of the Opposition a ‘racist’ for his concern about bringing into our country people from a war zone when our current terror alert is PROBABLE should be more than enough to indicate that the Parliament needs a radical clean out at the coming election.

Out with the extreme Left of Labor, what there is of the Greens, and definitely the ‘experimental’ Teals; and the wets in the Liberal Party.

With a 50-50 chance of a terrorist attack in the next 12 months, we need something better in Parliament than a silly woman calling a potential Prime Minister schoolyard names.

Although it is true that our voting system is a “protection racket” for the two major parties, the one now in power has brought Australia so low in less than one term, that we must give the other a go.

This foolishness about giving a first term government another chance is far too risky in the case of Albanese Labor.

ABC prime git Sarah Ferguson said "Putting Australians first is not a very Australian thing to say" after Dutton told her his priority was the security for Australians.

Peter Dutton's relatively small cliques of leftwing
decryers and rightwing admirers according to recent
surveys and polls, they over estimate how his controversial
career has registered with the majority of the general
public.

In any case, come what may, hurling spit balls at who
is perceived as the enemy - won't make a heap of difference
in the general scheme of things. It's the majority who will
decide at the next election - as to who they want as Prime
Minister. Whether Dutton's issues of - crime, race,
national security - all timeless political issues will
generate with the majority or not - we shall have to wait
and see.

Until then, we do have interesting times ahead. Perhaps Dutton
may succeed in winning people over if he broadens his focus
to include issues that are of concern to people. Also having
some long-term plans and policies would help.