The woman talks about supporters. Her only supporters are the two other left wing nutters on the site. Hundreds of posts - which she treats like notches on a gun butt, or runs on the board, and most of them are her own, most of the others disagreeing with her nonsense. Lots of squealing attempts to justify the unjustifiable from her.

The firm rejection of the Voice has really disturbed the balance of her mind, and exposed her and 40% of Australian voters to be out of touch lunatics. She and they will never recover. And what sort of poor fool needs 'support' for their opinions and ideas on the anonymous internet!

Foxy,

By any measure, Dutton is a better leader than Albozo. Albozo lies continuously and is arrogant. The sooner he is gone the better.

I've just seen a cartoon of the pamphlets of How to vote
YES and how to vote NO - in the Voice Referendum:

1) How to vote YES - write the word "YES" in the box.

2) How to vote NO - write the word you graffitied all
over your neighbours' car and letter boxes in the box.

Lol!

Anyhow, it's obvious - the role that fear and ignorance
played making sure that the Voice Referendum got defeated.
We all heard the lies that Aborigines would take our lands,
raise our taxes, take our houses, ruing our children's
future. That the Uluru Statement was more than one page.
That is had a "hidden agenda," that there were going to be
heaps of "stuff" that we were not told. Reparations,
and the lists went on.

Many of us were frustrated by this ignorance.
In law - ignorance of the law is not a defence. Therefore
you can't defend yourself based on "I didn't know, so
I'm voting NO." But that's how the NO campaign was conducted.
"If you don't know - vote NO!" Instead of "If you don't know
Find out!"

People say they love "freedom of speech." So do I. I do not
like hate speech - of which I am accused. Some have spoken
plenty of that. Free speech for some. No voice for others.

If people need to be angry, and some obviously do. then they
should be angry at Russia, China, Israel, Hamas, and above
all at Peter Dutton leading the race to the bottom to
return to power and there's no lie he won't tell to get
there - as we've seen from this recent Referendum.

A better Prime Minister than our current one?

I prefer someone who contributes something to public life
for the betterment of Australians. Someone who leads the
country and their government predominantly for the people.
Medicare anyone? How's your Super going? Apology to the
Stolen Generation? No worries. And finally at least trying
for a Voice to Parliament. Not someone who leads for the
sake of holding power.

Dutton is such a leader his own team are pushing for senator Jacinta Price to be the next PM. Not Dutton.
In grandiose style, overlooking the fact that she is in the wrong coalition political party so would have to change teams and get elected into a lower house seat before any chance of becoming PM, Jacinta's team are totally rejecting Dutton.
Dutton's team are not backing him for PM - that says a lot.

This obsession with Dutton is unhealthy and pointless. Dutton is no threat to anyone while he's in opposition. The threat is the bloke who is the PM, Anthony Albanese. There are indications that getting rid of Albanese would make the ALP more acceptable in its remaining time in office.

Will Aka provide evidence that Dutton’s "own team" is pushing for Price to be their leader. That "Jacinta's team" is "totally rejecting Dutton". Is Aka a Liberal party insider, or is he or she just making a mess of repeating what has been mused about by the media and casual commentators; all of which is just idle gossip.

I have no interest in Dutton or the Liberal Party. But I believe comments on him and about him, and who said what, should be verifiable: something that has not happened so far in this thread.