Dear Ipso Fatso,

So you believe Jewish heirs who are recipients of German reparation money should return it?

"From 1945 to 2018, the German government paid approximately $86.8 billion in restitution and compensation to Holocaust victims and their heirs. Germany has also identified Nazi-looted objects – including art works, books, and objects within larger collections – and has returned 16,000 objects to survivors and their heirs over the last 20 years. Thousands more pieces of looted art are still missing worldwide."
http://www.state.gov/reports/just-act-report-to-congress/germany/

Oops, wrong thread.

18 million or 28 million, makes no difference.
- It's worth magnitudes more than that, based on the value of other properties in the area.
Why don't you start over and have another go.

[Cont.]
By the way there's another fact I forgot Steelie, which was in Trumps disclaimer.
In the documents Trump used to value his properties for the loans, there were disclaimers.
The disclaimers made clear the valuations are unaudited, and may be inaccurate.
This was made clear to the people approving the loans.
Go look it up.

I'd be willing to bet half of congress have done the exact same thing.
Look at other things like Nancy Pelosi's completely legal insider trading that makes Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathoway annual percentage gains for its clients look amateurish.

One standard for the ruling class, and a different standard for everyone else.
They make rules to enrich themselves, while large segments of the country live in poverty.
A country that allows it's leaders to enrich themselves like that at the expense of everyone else, can't survive indefinitely.

http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-warren-buffett-stock-market-trading-bill-2022-10

Dear Armchair Critic,

The fact is the judge didn't make that assessment which is what was claimed in the video.

In fact he is quite incensed by people claiming he did.

http://nypost.com/2023/10/02/judge-implores-media-to-stop-saying-he-valued-mar-a-lago-at-18m/

The judge quoted a the Palm Beach Assessor who is responsible for valuing the property for taxation purposes. To lower those taxes Trump had signed away virtually every right for he or subsequent owners to every develop the land.

"Trust for Historic Preservation, Donald Trump agreed that "Trump intend [s] to forever extinguish [his] right to develop or use the Property for any purpose other than club use (the 2002 Deed ). The 2002 Deed also specifically "limits changes to the Property including,
without limitation, the division or subdivision of the Property for any purpose, including use as single family homes, the interior renovation of the mansion, which may be necessary and desirable for the sale of the Property as a single family residential estate, the construction of new buildings and the obstruction of open vistas ." Id. In exchange for granting the easement , Mar-a-Lago was taxed at a significantly lower rate (the club rate) than it otherwise would have been (the private home rate). NYSCEF Doc. No.903.
From 2011-2021, the Palm Beach County Assessor appraised the market value of Mar-a - Lago at between $ 18 million and $27.6 million. NYSCEF No.905."

http://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/trump-judges-ruling/ce6de7d636227e1b/full.pdf

Your bloke explained none of this even though he clearly had read the judgement.

Stop listening to bad faith actors.

Hi SteeleRedux,
I was already aware of the fact that Mar-A-Lago can't be knocked down and developed, and I still say it's severely undervalued.