The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Flight 93 and the treachorous disgrace of 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists.

Flight 93 and the treachorous disgrace of 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All
This is the anniversary of 9/11.

Many deluded people have fallen victim to wild and fantastic conspiracy theories that WE did it to ourselves.... to provide an excuse to invade Iraq etc..and get their oil. Just like the real incident of the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam to justify attacks there.

Looking at Flight 93 evidence ALONE, such conspiracy theories are exposed as not just human delusions, but as close as malicious political/social terrorism and treachery as it can get.

THEORY "Flight 93 could not have made cell phone calls with available technology in 2001"
FACT Flight 93 never went above 40,000 feet, 2001 technology allowed Cell phone use up to 50,000 feet.

THEORY "There were no human remains at the crash site."
FACT. Those who went there, including the coroner found many human remains/body parts.

THEORY "Flight 93 was 'shot down' by a white aircraft.
FACT A white small civilian white aircraft was DIRECTED to look at the crash zone to see what had happened, by the Air Traffic controller who was interviewed.

THEORY "There was wreckage up to 6 miles from the crash site, showing it was shot down"
FACT Yes..6.8 miles BY ROAD, less than 2 miles as the crow flies.

THEORY "No significant airframe parts were recovered"
FACT The nature of the crash was such that very few parts of any size would be left. (the physics of the impact)

FACT. The number of relatives who spoke to their loved ones on the plane..the number of families who lost loved ones.. the unbelievable idea that they all have been secreted away in some 'witness protection' conspiracy cover up location.. it defies the imagination and STIRS the soul to attack this betrayal of our freedom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories#Claims_that_Flight_93_was_shot_down
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93
Posted by BOAZ_David, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 3:25:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I totally agree Boaz.

Its the sort of claptrap that the extreme left love to spout. The conspiracy theorists are almost always pseudo-intellectuals with too much time on their hands. Were it not for the footage we would have the leftist morons trying to tell us it never happened at all, that really its just the gov't trying to control us using 'FEAR'.

Such people probably also had trouble with the BOOGIE MAN
Posted by Paul.L, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 7:13:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pay television indeed has had some VERY interesting items on 9/11 now the sixth anniversary is here. The cover up of it all. The warnings were many. Bush looks SO guilty in all his interviews. I am here to say to look up the 9/11 Timeline as put together by Paul Thompson. This individual has pieced together everything and it surely makes for interesting reading. Google "Paul Thompson" if you're interested further. The Jersey wives (4 widows of 9/11), have done more to investigate the towers than the government ever would. 190 million dollars was put to investigating Clinton and his sexual exploit yet initially only 3 million to the commission for 9/11. 14 months later the commission started the investigation (March 2003). How timely of them.
Posted by Cakers, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 9:27:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ah Crackers um I meen cakers,

Believe in Ghosts and vampires too mate? Look nothing this big can be covered up not in this day and age perhaps the 60's but not now. These widows you refer to needed somthing to hold onto cant begrudge them that. Ask any lawyer you can twist just about anything to serve a purpose its the motive in this case that I find chilling.
Posted by SCOTTY, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 9:58:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nevertheless it was Rumsfeld himself that referred to those people who "shot down that plane" over Pennsylvania in a TV interview.
A slip of the tongue or just a slip?

There are literally hundreds of anomalies and unanswered questions about the official story. The way it has been constructed- if a single fact is shown to be deliberately untrue - the whole thing falls apart.
Posted by rache, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 12:48:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BOAZ,
A few of your FACTS are suspect.

Mobile phone technology in 2001?
http://physics911.net/cellphoneflight93
The 3G and CDMA "pico-cell" technology that allows mobile calls to work in these circumstances was only developed and tested by Qualcomm in 2004.

Crash debris?
http://flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight93site.html
Seems like the some of the plane fell off during descent?

The mystery plane?
Authorities said they believe the plane was a Falcon 20 private jet that was headed to nearby Johnstown but was asked to descend and survey the crash site. Yet officials have never identified the pilot nor explained why he was still airborne roughly 30 minutes after the government ordered all aircraft to land at the closest airport.

The mobile phone calls from the passengers all stopped about 9:58 a.m. - roughly the same time that a caller to 911 in Westmoreland County stated there had been an explosion.

The plane didn't come down until 10:06 - leaving an 8-minute gap of unaccounted for air time, and thus a great mystery.

As crazy as some of the "conspiracy" stories sound, they are no more ridiculous and unlikely than the official story we have been fed.

What's also interesting is how all the initial TV news reports (like eyewitness reports from the Pentagon) that contradict the final story have never been officially shown since, only the "approved" ones that fit.
Posted by wobbles, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 1:29:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy