With four of his most fanatical supporters found guilty of sedition, is it about time Donald Trump was called in to face the music in relation to 6th January 2021 riots, and the attempted overthrow of the "democratically" election government. America claims it prides itself on justice for all, this is an opportunity for the so called land of the free to demonstrate true justice for all, even for an ex-president, or will they simply cut and run, locking up a few radical screw-balls like these fellas on the way.

"Four members of the far-right "Proud Boys" have been convicted for their role in the 2021 Capitol riot, but their lawyers have placed blame on Donald Trump saying he urged them to march on Washington." ABC News.

There's only one reason Trump will be bought up on what are clearly false charges.....

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/trump-crushing-biden-and-desantis-in-new-wapo-abc-news-poll/

It's a Trump witchhunt by the deep state, this same old tired bs has been going on since before he was elected with accusations he was pissed on by Russian prostitutes.
- Which was Hillary Clintons shiteshow.
Trump doesn't fall into line with US policy of endless wars and foreign entanglements.
I've already shown you before that there were FBI provocateurs encouraging the protestors on January 6 Paul.

Hi AC,

I'm not a fan of Trump or American politics, nor a fan of violence, so I don't condone the mob's action Jan 6th. I certainly find what you say interesting and entirely possible. Biden is exactly what the American Military–industrial complex requires, he is gung-ho to the boot straps, no doubt about that. You and others, along with my own reading has convinced me the war in Ukraine is an American invention and they are prosecuting that war by proxy. Conflict with China is completely avoidable, yet America insists on destabilisation of theirs and ours relationship with them, and as a consequence a drive to war with China in unfortunately highly likely.

p/s With the number of Trumpsters on the Forum, I thought they would go all out to defend their man Donald, but seems not.

There's only one reason Trump will be charged in relation to J6 and that is to try to tie him up in legal rope as the election approaches. Currently Trump is highly favoured to win the GOP nomination and somewhat favoured to defeat Slow Joe in the actual poll.

The deep state and its allies are terrified of a second Trump presidency and are prepared to tear down the rule of law to prevent it.

But there is nothing to convict Trump on as regards J6. The most recent evidence shows that the FBI was involved in hyping the move into the Capitol building and the Carlson tapes show that the people were largely ushered into the building by the authorities. Attorney-General Bill Barr called it a clown show and "Anyone who thinks the republic was in serious danger on January 6 is out of touch."

Equally there is video of Trump specifically telling his supporters to act peacefully. There's no case to answer but that doesn't mean the deep state/Democrats won't try to make one.

"Trump doesn't fall into line with US policy of endless wars and foreign entanglements."

No new wars were started during the Trump presidency. Ukraine wouldn't have happened had he been in charge. Trump's America First policy is hated by the ruling elite in Washington as well as Berlin, Brussels, Paris and London. They're all in favour of American working class blood being spilt to protect their phoney=baloney jobs... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgF_hP4GO_Q

" the war in Ukraine is an American invention"

Would it be churlish to point out that no one forced Putin to invade.

"Conflict with China is completely avoidable"

Would it be churlish to point out that its avoidable if China stops trying to conquer other nations.

mhaze,

"Would it be churlish to point out that no one forced Putin to invade."

No, but you can orchestrate things so it is so.

"Would it be churlish to point out that its avoidable if China stops trying to conquer other nations."

I don't believe that to be fact. from what I see, China is reactive more so than proactive. "conquer" seems to be too strong a word, given its definition of; "overcome and take control of (a place or people) by military force." Sounds more American than Chinese.