Paul has believed the lies and presents it as fact, without intelligent debate.

Opponents of the voice have listened to comments by a number of legal academics arguing the body could override the parliament.

Constitutional expert Greg Craven said the inclusion of the words "executive government" in the voice framework "actually takes the problems that people have identified with the preceding drafting and multiplies it".

Fester

According to the legal eagles, it does not need to be in the Constitution, and the Voice could be legislated any time. This has occurred in South Australia without so much as a by-your-leave to voters. The Minister at the front of this, incidently, claims to be part aboriginal himself, but so far, there is no evidence to show that he is. The woman ancestor he claimed to derive the aboriginality from has been found not to have any aboriginality; perhaps he made a mistake?

But, no. It does not need to be in the Constitution; but once it is, it's all over red rover unless another referendum overturns it.

1405

You have a cheek, complaining about name-calling: you do it in almost all of your toxic posts, you nasty, ignorant little man.

Indyvidual

I think that you will stick with NO. The more we hear, the worse it gets.

Labor has taken over NSW, with Joel Fitzgibbon saying it was because Minns used the Albanese method, or some such tosh. Probably not. The Liberals had it coming.

A map was put up with Australia all red, just like Communist China, apart from the tiny speck blue speck and that is Tasmania.

Hard times ahead, but we can lay the blame squarely at the feet of the Liberal Party for being stupid enough to think that emulating Labor would see them right.

The Voice can still be rejected though.

ttbn,

You can't see the fact the electorate has again comprehensively rejected conservative politics, how many times does it have to happen before you wake up. The millennial's and post-millennial's are solidly supporting progressive policy, there is no future for any political party or politician that is relying on the octogenarian vote, like the Liberals are, they are a dying minority, literally. Most folks of that old vintage have realistically one, possibly two, votes left in them.

You can't see the fact the electorate has again comprehensively rejected conservative politics,
Paul1405,
Yes and, as per usual they'll come to regret it again !