The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Finally Clarity The Voice Referendum Question

Finally Clarity The Voice Referendum Question

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. 14
  11. 15
  12. 16
  13. ...
  14. 29
  15. 30
  16. 31
  17. All
"Not only do they want the divisive Voice to ride roughshod over Parliament, it would have a direct say over every decision made by the executive government.

And the Voice will have the power to challenge those decisions in the High Court." (Jacinta Price Website)
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 8:42:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It has been revealed Albanese wanted different wording, which is why the tears, so he had to give in to the developers of the Voice. The Constant welcome to country is a forerunner to who owns the country, and the elected government does not speak for the land and its titles. We are being brainwashed to believe the Land belongs to aboriginal tribes that were stolen 250 years ago. No settlements and developments were agreed too and any future developments without approval and compensation must be put to the Voice for agreement and all occupied land will be subject to a rent tax payable to aboriginals. Like some areas already paying leases to aboriginals in Victoria.
Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 9:19:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pauliar,

You are a LIAR and a FRAUD. You keep on repeating the same lie as if it will become true.

You are a complete scumbag.
Posted by shadowminister, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 10:16:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A few weeks ago, on a separate thread, I suggested that the Voice could enable a small group of unelected activists to interfere with any legislation that was put forward by the parliament. Foxy claimed that this was not true and that Albozo had guaranteed that this would only be an advisory committee to parliament and would have no force of law and suggested I read the report. In doing so I discovered that the voice would have feelers extending to every parliament and every public service department in the country.

Attorney General Dreyfus was forced to concede that the "voice" would have the ability to challenge just about every piece of legislation and regulation brought to law. This would be an unmitigated disaster.

"The Prime Minister, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney are getting cranky, unable to answer questions as to how the voice will work, contradicting each other and forgetting or denying precedents for release of key legal advice or Labor’s policies.

As they move to play down the impact of the voice’s power to intervene on day-to-day government decisions, they are proposing more severe restrictions on Indigenous representatives’ intervention with new definitions that are not in the proposed referendum.

This ad-hoc redefinition, designed to placate fears of overreach from critics of the voice is already getting blowback from Indigenous supporters of the widest possible remit for intervention in making policies and laws.

Dreyfus has conceded that: voice representatives will have the power to go to the High Court claiming they have not been properly consulted; the governor-general would be subject to requests from the voice; and coverage would include tax, welfare, health, education and foreign policy."
Posted by shadowminister, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 11:15:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A young Aboriginal AFL player for the Western Bulldogs, Jamarra Ugle-Hagan, has fallen victim once again to the ugly side of this country, being on the end of sickening racist taunts

I just received the above in an email,
Does anyone know what that sickening racist taunt was ? I've seen sinpets on the News but none of them state what was said !
Posted by Indyvidual, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 6:25:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Indy,

Me thinks he was called a "CONCRETE JUNGLE BUNNY!".
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 28 March 2023 7:38:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. 14
  11. 15
  12. 16
  13. ...
  14. 29
  15. 30
  16. 31
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy