Perhaps Albanese agrees with shadowminister, and he is getting desperate, resorting to emotional blackmail as described above.

Daniel Wild of IPA opines that today's wording is not Albanese's "modest request", but rather a "dangerous demand" that will create a two tiered society "along racial lines".

Which is what we NO proponents have been saying all along.

The fact that the pushers of the Voice want this muck inserted into the Constitution confirms that they seek to "permanently entrench racial division in Australia".

Was not Australia one of the countries who rightly lambasted the Boers in South Africa for this sort of thing!

"This is the beginning of a very dark path, where an Australian’s race will be put ahead of their need and merit,” writes Daniel Wild.

Wild also says that the proposed wording confirms that the Voice will have veto power over every major decision of both parliament and the executive, making the Parliament of Australia "subservient to this race-based activist body.”

IPA research has revealed growing domestic and international evidence demonstrating that the proposed Indigenous only Voice will be more powerful and have a much more divisive impact on Australian culture and society than the Federal Government claims.

Australia’s "history of judicial activism" means the Voice to Parliament will almost certainly be granted far reaching legal powers.

Only a NO vote will confirm Australia's commitment to racial equality.

Albozo is a liar.

He promised Dutton that the voice would apply to the parliaments and not the public service. Once he had got the vote through, he changed his mind and included public service.

The voice as set out by Albozo is a huge monolith of rent seekers blocking every decision without a handout.

This means that bipartisanship is out of the window and the chance of the referendum failing is far greater.

Latest revelations about the Voice:

. There would be no democracy involved.

. Appointments only by the aboriginal 'aristocracy'.

. No say for grassroots.

. Voice would NOT replace a single one of all the existing quangos.

. Most of the business of the Voice would involve the 'aristocracy' fighting over who gets to spend the truck loads of money.

The solution to this supposed "Racism" and "Lack of Indigenous voice" is not forking out 100 million a year to pay for a committee of "Indigenous" (You are not allowed to call out the other percentage of their heritage or you are a RACIST) people from inner NSW who have never actually experienced poverty or can accurately help the indigenous community's. It is already known to many that funding for development of indigenous communities often finds its way into the elders back pocket, so why should we increase the size and issue of this problem further by doing it with larger sums of money.

Honestly the only person who would vote yes would be a woke leftist 20 year old whose house smells of weed, and has about as many braincells as the average BP fuel sniffer

And there is still no definition of "What is an Aborigine ?"
In a hundred years there will be very few blacks, just look at the
lineup of their present "leaders".

In 1066 the Normans conquered Britain.
For some hundreds of years the court & the Barons in Britain spoke French.
Now the Barons sit in the house of Lords and speak English.
Do you not see the similarity with what will happen with the voice.
Except here the voice of the aristocracy will have real power.

Bazz, yes in two hundred years from now there will be no genuine aboriginals as intermarriage will eradicate them. So, the Constitution will still be enforced to an elite group owning the land. It is called feudalism where we work for the landlords, we are owned by the Landlords, who have say over our lives. We are currently brainwashed to bow to the owners of the land, by welcome to their country. They have done nothing to build this nation its culture and security.