The Forum > Article Comments > Heaven, Earth and science fiction > Comments
Heaven, Earth and science fiction : Comments
By Mike Pope, published 11/6/2009To avoid following the polar bear to extinction, 'homo sapiens' would do well to reject the science fiction espoused by Professor Ian Plimer.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Page 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
Posted by mememine69, Friday, 3 July 2009 10:54:51 AM
| |
Hey troll boy, you didn't reply to my link!
Physical evidence that Co2 blocks heat from escaping the earth! Here you are troll boy... watch this! Watch it, waaaaaatch it, ready set.... GO! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6Un69RMNSw&feature=sdig&et=1246419220.11 Woof woof grunt grunt, good troll, gooooooood troooooooolllllll. In the mean time the world's most prestigious scientific organizations all agree. European Academy of Sciences and Arts, InterAcademy Council, International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences Joint science academies' statements Network of African Science Academies Royal Society of New Zealand Polish Academy of Sciences American Association for the Advancement of Science European Science Foundation National Research Council (US) American Society for Microbiology Australian Coral Reef Society Institute of Biology (UK) Society of American Foresters The Wildlife Society (international) American Geophysical Union European Federation of Geologists European Geosciences Union Geological Society of America International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London American Medical Association Australian Medical Association European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control World Federation of Public Health Associations World Health Organization American Meteorological Society Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Royal Meteorological Society (UK) World Meteorological Organization American Quaternary Association International Union for Quaternary Research American Astronomical Society American Chemical Society American Institute of Physics American Physical Society American Statistical Association Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia) Let me translate this in words you can understand. Ummm, let’s see, how to put this delicately. In other words, you’re an idiot. Posted by Eclipse Now, Friday, 3 July 2009 1:26:51 PM
| |
“Preserve, protect and respect our planet” says meme who hails from Canada.
So let’s see how the Fatherland is contributing to mitigating carbon dioxide. 1. Yesterday, July 2, a new study was published which says Canada has fallen to last place among G8 nations on the climate scorecard. Canada now stands dead last in protecting a country from dangerous climate change. The study shows that Canada's greenhouse gas emissions are steadily increasing, and its per capita emissions are among the highest in the world. 2. Canadian miners are the largest environmental vandals on the planet. Their worldwide operations have destroyed livelihoods and the environment in many countries. Communities from Argentina to Papua New Guinea have organized to demand their basic human rights. As a consequence of this negligence, Canada has drawn criticism from around the world, first by environmental, religious and human rights organizations, and now increasingly from international institutions, such as the United Nations. The harsh reality accompanying the presence of their mining industry abroad, is characterized by environmental destruction, political corruption, community struggles, human rights abuses, and massive amounts of water consumption. 3. Last year Canadian miner, Mega Uranium threatened legal action against Western Australia’s State Government if it proceeded with plans to ban uranium mining. 4. Canadian miner, Barrick Gold are the largest emitter of mercury in Australia and last year, were fined for spilling 4.5 million litres of toxic waste - the second time in a year they've been fined for this type of offence. 5. Back home in the Fatherland, toxic pollution from mining tar sands have found fish and game animals covered with tumours and mutations. Fish frying in a pan smells like burning plastic. One study concluded that arsenic could be as much as 453 times the acceptable levels in moose meat from the region: http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/TarSands_TheReport%20final.pdf Naturally there’s a Canadian denialist front group conspiring to propagate this environmental carnage - the “Natural Resources Stewardship Project” whose members refuse to disclose funding sources. Is it surprising that discredited mining executive, Ian Plimer, is listed as an “Allied Expert” for the planet's grim reapers? Posted by Protagoras, Friday, 3 July 2009 3:50:36 PM
| |
You should be ashamed of such language, Eclipse Now.
The first stage of tyranny is to dehumanize the enemy. http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/dehumanization/ Posted by gilliana, Saturday, 4 July 2009 3:45:20 PM
| |
Do share with us Gilliana, the reason you see only the splinter in Eclipse's eye and not the plank in meme's?
Posted by Protagoras, Saturday, 4 July 2009 4:21:38 PM
| |
Interesting post gilliana. I went there & read the article.
The problem is that each side views the other as inferior & both sides of the conflict have tried to dehumanize the other. Each feeling that they have the superior stand. So does that make them both in violation or have they cancelled each other out? ;-) Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 4 July 2009 4:21:52 PM
|
-You warmies get so hysterical sometimes as if warming and melting has never happened on the little old helpless planet earth.
-Research into globull warming is almost 100% spent on proposed effects, not causes.
-You warmies can’t sustain this low brow level of debate that is sliding globull warming into pure superstition. How long can you try and tell people that what they see, is not what they think they see?
-There isn’t a climate crisis nor was there a climate crisis and therefore there won’t be a climate crisis from harmless CO2, a building block of life.
-You do however cling to one single totally out of perspective thin thread of truth. Yes, CO2 “IS”, yes “IS” a greenhouse gas, technically and argumentatively.
-Do you really think we can stop the planet from warming? The theory predicts a climate crisis. Like what could be more important? It’s the equivalent to a coming comet hit. It’s so flippant of you warmies to drop a load of crisis and not take it seriously yourself.
-And you want to give tax money to a politician who promises to lower the earth’s temperature? I’ve heard of election promises but come on now! You would have to be a pure Greenzi to gooses-step to that level of intellect.
So here is the score and I will leave you with the last word and invite you to join us at http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warming the world’s largest open forum on glowbull warming.
I’m willing to chance it that you and your global warming theory are totally 100% wrong and pose no threat in the least.
I’m sure when the tide fully does turn in the denier’s side, you will then follow us. That too I will bet on.