The Forum > Article Comments > Terrorists attacking Mumbai have global agenda > Comments
Terrorists attacking Mumbai have global agenda : Comments
By Ashley Tellis, published 15/12/2008The barbarity in Mumbai represents the ugly face of Islamist terrorism that threatens India, the US and its allies.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by Philip Tang, Friday, 19 December 2008 10:54:04 AM
| |
http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-pakistan-to-blame.html
The fact that the Indian government is accusing Pakistan is taken with a grain of salt as this is not the first time the Indian government has blamed Pakistan, only to find later that Pakistan had nothing to do with the violence it was being accused of. Interestingly, four times previously the Indian government falsely accused Lashkare Taiba directly as the organization sponsoring violent incidents in India, and Pakistan indirectly for harbouring the militant group, although Pakistan officially banned the outfit in 2002. In each of the incidents, namely, the Chattisinghpura massacre, the attack on the Indian Parliament on 13 December 2001, the Malagaon blasts and the Samjhota Express incident, investigations were either refused or revealed that neither Lashkare Taiba nor Pakistan but groups from within India were responsible. In the Chattisinghpura incident, for example, on 20 March 2000, one day before President Bill Clinton was due to arrive in India, 35 Sikhs were killed in the village of Chattisinghpura. It was said that about 15 uniformed men belonging to Lashkare Taiba and trained in Pakistan were responsible. Five days later, five men were killed by paramilitary forces in a village called Pathribal, claiming that the “foreign militants” responsible for the Sikh massacre had been found and duly eliminated. When local village people protested, investigations began. When the final results of the investigation were made public, it was found that local police were responsible for the massacre of the Sikhs. The Samjhota Express incident is more disconcerting, ... Four months later, investigations revealed that neither Rana nor Lashkare Taiba but a serving lieutenant colonel of the Indian army, Lt. Col. Purohit was responsible for the attack. Purohit, it was found, had links with Hindu militant groups and provided training to extremists. For Pakistan, the most troubling aspect of the 26 November 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai is the fact that the three brave men who had been tasked with finalizing the findings of both the Samjhota Express incident and the Malegaon blasts linking Lt. Col. Purohit conclusively to the terrorist attacks were all killed. ... Posted by daggett, Friday, 19 December 2008 3:09:36 PM
| |
Here's some more stories:
"Role of Alleged CIA Asset in Mumbai Attacks Being Downplayed" of 11 Dec 08 by Jeremy R. Hammond at http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2008/12/role-of-alleged-cia-asset-in-mumbai.html "The Tailor of Mumbai" of 23 Dec 08 by Jeff Huber at http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2008/12/tailor-of-mumbai.html "The Mumbai enigma" of 20 Dec 08 by Jeremy R. Hammond at http://atheonews.blogspot.com/2008/12/mumbai-enigma.html I haven't read them myself so I can't vouch for them. Posted by daggett, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 10:24:24 AM
|
On hindsight, to 'MOHAMMAD GOEBBELS Bin Laden' should be added the name MUGABE to become MOHAMMAD GOEBBELS MUGABE Bin Laden.
GOEBBELS because you're the most worthy spin-doctor to replace him when he committed suicide.
MUGABE not because you are a promising revolutionary or statesman, but because like Mugabe is mule-headed, bull-headed, in a mental state of denial, not being able to perceive realities going round him.
MOHAMMAD Bin Laden because you're an apologist for the Islamists.
Have a good Christmas, ...sorry a good Ramadan, Eid, Hajj or something like that