The Forum > Article Comments > The politics of apology and the laws of compensation > Comments
The politics of apology and the laws of compensation : Comments
By Nilay Patel, published 14/2/2008Many international conventions binding on Australia recognise a right to an effective remedy for the stolen generations: but what are the legal issues?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
Of course the "throw money at them" strategy had to be tried so at least we can say - been there done that. How many other govts & nations around the world throw (& keep throwing) bucket-loads of money at their indigenous people, let alone give them a voice so they can continue to shout: “give us more, you racist scum!”.
The Aborigines must be the most favoured & fortunate indigenous group ever in history, & still they sob uncontrollably. I know how the Tutsis or Hutus or the Dutch of Spannish or anyone else would have dealt with the situation. Not even the Chinese of Nanking collectively carry on the way our indigenous folk do. I wonder how much attention the Japanese would give the "SG"?
The Aborignes got their apology - but of course that was never the real aim, & the Liberals knew it & every previous Labor govt knew it as well. This labor govt of course had no option but to apologise after Howard's refusal to led to a cacophony of wailing & shrieking by the left. Rudd could hardly come out & say...well actually I agree with Howard (& Keating & Hawke & Fraser & Whitlam et al – each a self-professed “conscience of the nation” ).
If taxpayers are forced to pay up for (yet again) the "SG", my bet is it won't end there. Place your bets folks...