The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Darling of cultural warriors > Comments

Darling of cultural warriors : Comments

By Irfan Yusuf, published 29/6/2007

Can't the Islam-haters out there find a more credible 'insider' to promote their cause than Ayaan Hirsi Ali?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. 14
  11. 15
  12. 16
  13. 17
  14. 18
  15. 19
  16. All
Or:

F. Jesus never existed (he could've been someone's imaginary friend).

Lol, Yabby- if all these so-called "prophets" had been medicated we'd probably be all atheists.
Posted by Celivia, Wednesday, 4 July 2007 8:57:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Celivia, if you think about it, most of the religious nuts
on here, are in fact atheists bar one.

I take a bit of an agnostic position. Any so called
god is free to write his commandments on the face of the
moon, for all of us to see. None has ever bothered.

If one ever does, I'm sure we will all pay attention.

Until then, I'd say its far more probable that the
normal criteria apply. Deluded humans are a dime a
dozen... No wonder that selling snake oil is such
a thriving business!
Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 4 July 2007 11:03:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes Cilvia,why are there no modern prophets or messiahs?The answer is that modern science would soon reveal the lie.

Religion is the dummy from which we feeble humans must suckle from to comfort our inadaquate feelings.

We can have ethical courageous people without all the fantacy of the religious dogma.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 4 July 2007 11:04:14 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Something I read recently:

“He was impaled by that same single-mindedness which is a form of tunnel vision.Buddhism was too subtle for him then as it is today… To the evolved mind of the Gautama Buddha any desire was obscene, even the desire for God”
Posted by Horus, Thursday, 5 July 2007 5:45:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Logic, first you said Israel and secondly you certainly have a different take on pre-Roman mid-east history. It was one of tribal infighting and religious sect wars. And social and religious tolerance would not have had the Romans seeing the area ripe for their version of law and order.
Posted by aqvarivs, Thursday, 5 July 2007 8:35:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
All your answers show how unsettled you all become when confronted with the person of Jesus.

Humour is a natural response to dodge the question; so is sarcasm and personal attack.

TR suggests:
“… the Gospels are not historical accounts but are in fact mythological accounts.

Which particular book? Give us some specifics.

Logic asks:
How much of Christianity was changed at Nicea?

None.
My understanding is that Nicea settled different views and emerging new philosophies that arose post Gospel accounts. Not one word was changed from the life, death, resurrection, and future coming of Jesus.

The trinity concept of God for example is present throughout the Old and New Testaments; from Genesis to Revelation. It was a matter for the newly formed Church to grasp that.

Same goes with the deity of Christ. Some said He was just human, others insistyed He was totally divine; the reality has always been that He was both: "God incarnate". But they had to come to that consensus.

So is Christianity a human invention? The answer is definitely NO.

Celivia suggests,

“Most likely E.
Just another case of schizophrenia”

Hard to prove but an honest answer. Similar to option b) Lunatic


Yabby,
When you look in a mirror what do you see? A modern monkey with a more developed brain?

Arjay,
“…why are there no modern prophets or messiahs?”

Historically speaking there has been and are hundreds if not thousands of false ones.

But only one Jesus.

Can science prove Him wrong?
Posted by coach, Thursday, 5 July 2007 11:12:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. Page 13
  10. 14
  11. 15
  12. 16
  13. 17
  14. 18
  15. 19
  16. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy