The Forum > Article Comments > Flames of protest should be seen from more than one viewpoint > Comments
Flames of protest should be seen from more than one viewpoint : Comments
By Helen Irving, published 4/9/2006To make flag-burning against the law would be to dilute the freedoms it represents.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
Let’s find out shall we. What about I round up a seething mob and take them to the Lakemba mosque. Once the mob has assembled I deliver a speech denouncing our government’s dealings with Lebanon and in particular the free hand that country’s government gives to Hezbollah. The mob then produces a few official flags of Hezbollah and Lebanon and we torch them. All of this done under the aegis of our treasured freedom of political speech. There wouldn’t be enough police to handle the riot.
People who lecture on the aridites of the law are truly lost when they try to understand emotions, passions and other human feelings. And the legal club isn’t immune from expressing its version of outrage. It is very quick to slap a contempt of court fine on those who test the theory of freedom of political speech when done inside the court. As a matter of fact one person was locked up for 27 months because he wanted to use his freedom to remain silent when he was in court.
Perhaps we should allow flag-burning or the burning of effigies but such action should guarantee the right to retaliate by the group that takes offence. If the original action was carried out by a group of uni students (at the urging of the uni lecturers) a mannequin with its head filled with sawdust should be torched on uni grounds, just outside the chancellor’s office. I’m sure no one would take offence.