The Forum > Article Comments > Legal abuse of animals > Comments
Legal abuse of animals : Comments
By Katrina Sharman, published 21/6/2006Discussion about animal rights is fast moving into the mainstream.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
That is an absolute hoot. I am wheezing in pain with laughter.
Obviously Pericles' assessment of the enslavement of critters was not formulated around owning a cat!
Anyone who has will confirm, no one owns a cat. Cats own their keepers!
I just do not get it with some people who feel that lower orders of animals and critters have similar needs for democratic representation as people.
Those who do seem to me to be deranged simpletons who lack real challenges and issues in their lives, they have lived a pandered existence where some hireling else sorted out all the crap before they awoke and tidied up after the precious wallies went to bed.
Like PETA who seem to believe their precious opinions should be thrown down the throats of Australian pastoralists and graziers. Then the anti-live sheep export mob, to say nothing of the “animal liberationists” who destroyed the fur industry.
Fortunately what I do is unlikely to ever come into contact with such low life scumbags but if they did, I would happily give them a run for their money.
That said, following Abercrombie and Fitch’s acquiescence to PETA I have vowed never to buy a suit from them now or in the future. Anyone can boycott anything and a boycotting the PETA supporter group is what I can and will continue to do.
As for those who lived on farms and can no longer eat meat, good, your withdraw of demand makes the price of cuts cheaper for the rest of us, enjoy your lentils.