The Forum > Article Comments > Putting God back in the church > Comments
Putting God back in the church : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 13/6/2006Is postmodernism just more radical scepticism - or could it be the saviour of God?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Priscillian : Mostly the Bible but I agree I have come to my opinion from a number of sources as I assume you do also.
Sells: You really should take more effort in your research because what you have asserted is shear foolishness.
Priscillian: I will take your advice. Maybe I am foolish to place radical ideas before religious believers. Superstitious believers are on shaky ground calling others foolish
Sells: Paul had no role in selecting the gospels, that came much later....
Priscillian: Sorry If I gave the wrong impression. Paul did not “select” himself but gathered many followers and wrote. His influence on many of the original gospels must have been enormous. Many gospels were rejected because they contradicted Paul's earlier teaching…fact.
Sells: ...and he certainly was no gnostic.
Priscillian: Hmm, A contentious point but from the 6 or 7 pieces of genuine Paul writings we have in the NT it seems he has a Gnostic bent. He came from Tarsus (Mithra?), hung around Ephesus (Dionysus?), Roman citizen (Pagan?) taught by Pharisees (Jewish?), well travelled (wordly?)…hardly a kosher Jew.
1. Jesus came not as a person but in the "likeness of human flesh".....Gnostic illusionism
2. Paul claimed to ascended to the "third heaven"........The Gnostic seven heavens linked to the seven heavenly bodies.
3. Paul criticises ceremonies, holy days etc.........like Gnostics did
4. Teaches that Christians become like Christ....."transfigured into his likeness".........pure Gnosticism
5. Romans 1: 9-14 "I would like to see you, so that I may share a certain Pneumatic charisma"....pure Gnostic terminology (translated “spiritual gift”),
aka 1 Corinthians 2:6-9, Colossians 2 :3 etc.
I have run out of space for further evidence on this…