The Forum > Article Comments > Desperate enough to come to Australia > Comments
Desperate enough to come to Australia : Comments
By Howard Glenn, published 11/5/2006The use of Nauru and Manus Island from 2001 to 2005 as processing centres for asylum seekers was a horrible experience for all involved and should not be repeated.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Now to the notion of mandatory detention.
Let's suppose that Chad decided to mandatorily detain 250,000 Sudanese refugees and then process their claims. How long would it take when Australia with all our wealth and resources cannot manage 4,000 at the very highest for one year.- Remember Chad got them all in a few weeks and we watched.
Some of the refugees might eventually end up in Australia but these days it will take 17 years - but imagine the cost of 250,000 refugees locked up for 17 years without work rights?
Here is the lunacy of the situation. They use the word mandatory fo all people without a visa. But they only lock up people who come on boats while 60,000 people each year who stay after their visas run out are not locked up.
Therefore it is discriminatory detention so the act should be changed. It is just a law and can be changed, it is not the holy writ as Leigh seems to think.
The word used these days is unauthorised Leigh and even that is meaningless as the Migration act of Australia and the refugee convention authorises anyone to come here.
Jolanda, there is no requirement for muslims to live in muslim countries when it is muslim factions killing each other any more than christians have to stay where they are being killed.
Get a grip woman.