The Forum > Article Comments > Papua crucial to Indonesia > Comments
Papua crucial to Indonesia : Comments
By Richard Chauvel, published 29/3/2006Indonesia needs international support to help reduce its dependence on violence to govern Papua.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
-
- All
"There is indeed a very big difference between Australian and Indonesian migration, your migration is a criminal and illegal act of landgrab where you inflicted physical and cultural genocide upon the West Papuan people. Meanwhile, Australia's legal migration into that continent is an overwhelmingly positive development for economic and social progress of native Australians, whose tribal customs were given the widest respect, whose political ascendancy we protect by law, and whose human development we subsidise.
Indeed, migrants in Australia have turned the provinces into the worlds food-bowl and they are the centre of all economic/commercial development there. Without these hard-working migrants, the economy of Australia would collapse and most Australians would end-up unemployed".
And before you get too far into your stereotypes, I can advise that my pioneer ancestors paid for their land in full to the government that sold it to them. Which is a lot more than your generals do for their logging concessions over tribal forests.
And furthermore, it was our farms that provided the social safety net for the aboriginal community who understood that an easier and more dependable way to maintain a full stomach was with a chipping hoe, a ringbarking axe or a brush hook. There was very little charity anywhere 150 years ago and least of all in the cities. And it was this knowledge, that a day spent weeding always covered the cost of a full stomach, that sent the urban unemployed down country roads during the great depression. You can demonise our history all you want but all through the Australian bush there are properties where the aborigines supplied the knowledge and the labour in exchange for the marketing and administrative skills of the nominal white "owner". As one of the Durack family said, "if there was exploitation, it was mutual".
But of course, in your mind "mutual benefit" only takes place in Indonesia while "genocide and dispossession" only occurs in Australia.