John Daysh,
So, what you're saying it's ok for some but not for others ?

Indyvidual,

No, the fundamental rule applies to all: no one is entitled to utilise another person's body without their explicit consent.

Some more reading for anyone with a moral compass who can see the evil in this barbaric practice where the "autonomous bodily rights" of newborn live babies, no longer part of their mother's body, are frequently totally overlooked as they are left to die without any treatment.

Vikki Campion in The Telegraph : https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/campion-inhumane-deaths-aborted-babies-born-alive-are-being-left-to-die/news-story/0e7cdbbdf245a8020674b669e9505174

Gemma Tognini in The West Australian (also in The Australian): https://thewest.com.au/opinion/gemma-tognini/law-is-wrong-when-unborn-lives-are-lost-ng-b88999761z

Rowan Dean in The Spectator: https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/08/dead-babies/?

the majority of Islamic jurists throughout history, because of Islam's respect for life, do not allow abortion except for strong medical reasons.
John Daysh,
Are you in agreement with this tactic to out-breed the West ? Are you in agreement with the rights of that religion's women in Australia in that ?

Indyvidual,

The issue of bodily autonomy is a universal human right that applies regardless of the cultural or religious context.

Are you suggesting that we force all Western women with healthy pregnancies to carry to full term so Muslims don't out-breed us?

John Daysh,
I asked you that but you replied with a very cheap evasion. So, why not answer that question of women in Australia being forced to have children simply because they belong to a certain religion. Are you sympathising with the religion-based forced pregnancies in Australia or termination of the unwanted ones of women of other faith