Thanks for your feedback Alan B.

But I'm not sure that I would agree that you're not a hater given your comments. It seems that our politics are different.

It appears you've implied I am a Neo-Nazi-White-Supremicist- aside from the ad hominem- I'd say that everyone is biased and bigoted in favour of their own ideology- a culture or system can't survive unless the members of the system act to protect it- and I don't generally advocate killing of anyone if you're implying that I'm a murderer.

I'm not even sure I know what a Neo-Nazi-White-Supremicist is- a Nazi by definition is a National Socialist as I understand- I remember apparent Green Watermelon Paul1405 saying that he had read Hitler's Mein Kampf- I don't consider myself a Socialist or a Communist- but I haven't felt the need to read so called Nazi literature. My sense of Nazism- reactionary politics due to spread of Communism after Oct 1919 Revolution, Romanov 1800's decline, historical activities- Paris Commune 1860's, French Revolution 1790's, John Locke and the English Civil War 1660's. I'm afraid I don't know much more about The Nazi's than what is available through popular media- mostly through Hollywood. I understand that Britain's ethnicity and language is similar to the Germanic Nordic people.

I have however viewed Dostoevsky, Solzenitzen, Bezmenov, Burnham and their views on Global Communist Nihilism which seem to be a feature of the left.

The Father of the New Left is considered to be Frankfurt School Hebrew Trotskyite Herbert Marcuse- 1900's- books including The One Dimensional Man, Eros and Civilization.

There are other interesting socially left writers including Saul Alinsky- Hebrew writer of Rules for Radicals. Alinsky seems to be promoting genocide of white people from memory- presumably in the US. He was apparently a member of the eugenics movement.

If you have any coherent information that adds to my knowledge I'll be interested in hearing it.

Thanks again for your feedback Alan B- but I still hold (despite your "argument") that "the Left appear to be agents for the CCP"- despite any tantrums to the contrary.

It seems that Andras Smith is doing a bit of dog whistling himself- perhaps in favour of Trotskyist Nihilistic Globalism under the guise of Humanitarianism.

It's interesting that both Socialist's and Libertarian's both favour global industrial systems. The study of Marx's 3 Volumes of Das Capital seems to me to be an exercise in self torture. The difference is that Socialist's apparently believe in "Academic Tyrants".

The human mind has a capacity for emotion, that seems to be its problem!
These emotions are then harnessed to an ideology.
Same emotions, different ideologies.

There is a mysterious process at work.
Conditioning is a process requiring emotion: (Pavlov and his dogs).
Conditioning is a process which manipulates emotions.

The mysterious motivator. The endless list!
Truth: One mans truth is another mans lie! Same emotions.
The unfixable problem; domination.
The fix is war.

There is no stopping it!

Dan

ttbn
What is the rules based order?
Answer = The world run BY and FOR the interests of the United States.

Why do Russia and China say they are on the right side of history?
Because they do not support this US vision of the world anymore.
- Which means THEY ARE on the right side of history.

Russia is achieving its military objectives in Ukraine.

The US and the West, by blocking access to Russians own money has shown itself to be untrustworthy.
- And just as they're willing to fight down the the last Ukrainian to get at Russia,
- They've also just shown that they too will be willing to fight to the last Taiwanese to get at China.

China will most likely take Taiwan back in the coming years,
And there's nothing the US or anyone else can do about it.

CM: Not even worth responding to when you simply 'shoot messengers'

AC: 'Russia is achieving its military objectives in Ukraine', really, what evidence is there for this?

They are allegedly nearing a dozen lost Generals, better resources inc. tanks/aircraft, one of three capital ships and former allies; China looking to keep its distance.....

Meanwhile the state of the military shows top down control (no NCOs etc.), corruption in procurement/supply (familiar locally...?), low morale and soon will have to start using conscripts from Moscow and St. Petersburg regions; hope no domestic uprisings or internal strife kicks off....

Armchair Critic said- "What is the rules based order? Answer = The world run BY and FOR the interests of the United States."

Answer- Personally I don't think humanity is mature enough to play nicely in a rules based order- perhaps we will never be- so we're left with dominance with limited freedom within a sandbox.

Like pack dogs and the top dog- but the English top dog is the holy trinity Westminster System.

The rules based order is more something that helps groups trade and negotiate with limited conflict. People such as Saul Alinsky see the order as being something that is to be used as a weapon against the ones managing the order to make it unworkable.

As others have said- there is no perfect system- we are all stumbling in the darkness- some more than others.

One measure that has been reliable to determine the stability of different systems is how long they are able to last.