The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Trump allegations of election fraud in Georgia to be investigated > Comments

Trump allegations of election fraud in Georgia to be investigated : Comments

By David Singer, published 24/3/2021

The New York Times, CNN and ABC – who had run with the original Washington Post story - also made similarly embarrassing back downs.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
Diver Dan, that little act of stupidity by whoever is responsible for "pulling" that video, (I did not know that by the way, so thanks for the heads up) is part of the problem I have discovered/uncovered.
I can see that these "public" forums are a joke, and anything but!
That video confirmed, once and for all, the fact that there really was ELECTION FRAUD, and these people, who are data specialists, found evidence of the very activity that Trump obviously knew about, the missing votes.
Since then, to vindicate me and Trump, Georgia has sent the vote counting machine to be forensically examined, and Trumps suspicions have been confirmed.
Not to be out-done, several other states have followed Georgia, and what do you know?
They also had evidence of what they call "vote flipping".
I am finding it increasingly hard to believe that there are such twisted, ignorant AND arrogant ideologically led morons out there who are so gutless as to NOT stand and fight the good fight by accepting that the left is bent and completely mis-guided, in ALL their beliefs and views, especially about people, the world, and the honesty and integrity of the completely retarded left.
I cannot get my head around a person/people having such stupid and childish beliefs, and because of this will drag us all down to their level, just like the sicko's in the US by voting in a demented, blithering, old, treasonous moron, with a useless slut as his VP.
I'll get around to explaining/describing what LEFT means and where/how it came to be.
I can say that it is ironic that they are called the "LEFT".
Later.
Posted by ALTRAV, Wednesday, 24 March 2021 3:24:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Trump's lawyer said no 'reasonable people' would believe her claims of voter fraud"

http://www.9news.com.au/world/sidney-powell-donald-trump-election-lawsuit-defamation-dominion-voting-systems-us-politics/b0f93c3c-d228-46ec-8ddb-62a1087c9cd0

It appears you koolaid drinkers are unreasonable people. Well yes, no disputing that is there.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Wednesday, 24 March 2021 4:40:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
SR, I expect a better submission from you.
Even though at times, I may disagree with your intent and content, you have in the past, on most occasions, provided clear and obvious points, with rarely a sign of innuendo or sarcasm.
This latest posting however, eludes me, slightly.
Firstly it appears the quote is made in an "ad hoc" manner.
Secondly are you referring to "her" claims of voter fraud? or
Thirdly are you referring to her claims of "voter fraud"?
You see, my dilemma is that, anything, claims included, made by a third party, especially one not involved first hand, I take as mere speculation.
The imputations of her comments do not carry weight as they are made as a third person removed.
Whether the statement is of her own volition, or by instruction, it holds no sway, or value, in the form or context as presented.
Seeing as how I am not the sharpest tool in the shed, I wonder if you could clarify your comments and/or their intent.
Posted by ALTRAV, Wednesday, 24 March 2021 5:13:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Altrav, Fat Chance. You are dealing with leftie propaganda. Every thing is ok especially contradictions.You should know someone’s ‘eating their lunch’ When Biden says it but when Trump says someone’s ‘eating their lunch’, Trump’s a liar.
Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 25 March 2021 12:35:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
1. Sydney Powell isn't Trump's lawyer.
2. If you read her filings in this case (and trust me, SteeleRedux hasn't and won't do that) you'll see that what's been reported in SR's link is rubbish. Which is why SR fell for it - he always falls for rubbish.
3. The article SR linked is copied from an article in the Washington Post which is being attacked and laughed at by all and sundry, even normally leftwing allies.

Meanwhile in the sane world, Georgia is moving ahead with a full audit of all the ballots from November 2020. Although we should note that when Arizona did that, election officials destroyed an unknown number of those ballots. We all know why they'd do that.

Elsewhere Wisconsin is the latest state to start an inquiry into the election fraud by reviewing their ballots.

And just to add to the hilarity, Democrats are now arguing that measures to remove the dead from the rolls is voter suppression - because we all know the dead vote overwhelmingly Democrat
Posted by mhaze, Thursday, 25 March 2021 9:46:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear mhaze,

You really a childish fellow aren't you.

Sydney Powell certainly was your president's lawyer even if the headline didn't make that clear.

Her filings specifically state:

“Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants’ position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.”

But she had directly claimed that she had evidence that the election result was the “greatest crime of the century if not the life of the world.”

Now Powell is also drawing on free speech principles, the refuge of many of the mendacious Trump cohort claiming “Because the statements on which Plaintiffs premise their defamation claims are protected by the First Amendment and not actionable, Plaintiffs fail to state a defamation claim.”

All rubbish of course.

As to saying the article has been laughed at even by the left how about you provide a link.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Thursday, 25 March 2021 11:19:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy