The Forum > Article Comments > The City of Darwin: honouring a blatant racist > Comments
The City of Darwin: honouring a blatant racist : Comments
By Andrew Kulikovsky, published 2/2/2021So Darwin asserts that both human-like (anthropomorphus) apes and 'savage races' like Negros and Australian Aborigines, whose evolutionary status is not far above a gorilla, will be 'exterminated' by Caucasians.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
-
- All
Posted by LEGO, Thursday, 4 February 2021 2:44:13 AM
| |
To Paul1407
For you to suggest that "individual" should reveal his family ethnicity in order for you to judge why he holds his contrary opinions, is racist. You are suggesting that different races and ethnicities hold certain views because of their race and ethnicity. Not that I disagree with your racist implication, mind you. But I am supposed to be the racist while you are claiming to be an anti racist. If you don't believe in racism then don't practice it yourself. As for statue removing, name cleansing, and cleansing history of politically incorrect types such as Darwin, Palmerston, and Cook, why don't you go the whole hog and demand that the Egyptians tear down the pyramids because the ancient Egyptians had slaves? I am not surprised that you scoff at my declaration that I am a believe in democracy and not right wing socialist totalitarianism. But and your ilk, any person who believes in democracy but who holds right wing views is automatically a Nazi. Back on topic. Racism has many definitions but essentially it grades different races as being superior or inferior. The Nazis believed that racial superiority was hierarchical with blacks being the lowest and blue eyed, blond haired white people being the highest. That is malarky. But any reasonable person (even Paul1407) with even high school level science can understand that races can not be equal, because each race evolved separately over tens of thousands of years to give themselves an advantage within the particular environments they evolved in. And those environments differed wildly. If all races are equal, then perhaps Paul1407 and Bronwyn could do something about the "black privilege" that is causing black people to dominate any sport involving long distance running? Posted by LEGO, Thursday, 4 February 2021 4:15:52 AM
| |
Hiya LEGO
The WHITE NATIONALIST "White race threatened by just about everybody: including Muslims, LGBTQI, etc" views http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australian_white_nationalists you espouse on OLO are well identified by "The Runnymede report" (UK 2019) http://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/pdfs/islamophobia.pdf _______________ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia#Contrasting_views_on_Islam That Report stated that the following "closed" views are equated with Islamophobia: 1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change. 2. It is seen as separate and "other". It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them. 3. It is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive, and sexist. 4. It is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism, and engaged in a clash of civilizations. 5. It is seen as a political ideology, used for political or military advantage. 6. Criticisms made of "the West" by Muslims are rejected out of hand. 7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society. 8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal." ______________________ White Nationalists ignore the worst Terrorist act committed in our (maybe not your?) region: TARRANT in Christchurch. Regards Posted by plantagenet, Thursday, 4 February 2021 9:09:15 AM
| |
LEGO,
You might be right about groups evolving in their own environments at different rates. Europeans were amongst the last people on the Eurasian-African super-continent to abandon the savage life of hunting and gathering and be forced (moatly by inter-marriage with farming populations, ultimately from western Asia) into farming, towns, literacy, wearing decent clothes, etc. - barely a couple of thousand years ago. Much less in some parts of Britain: Scots were still foraging in the glens and on the shores barely a century ago. Africans, of course, have been farming for perhaps ten thousand years in the west and perhaps took the concept to Egypt as the Sahara dried out, certainly not the other way around. They have been smelting iron for perhaps four thousand years - when Britons were still Stone Age savages, covering themselves with mud against the cold. Joe Posted by loudmouth2, Thursday, 4 February 2021 9:39:46 AM
| |
TARRANT in Christchurch.
plantagenet, You make it sound like he did you a favour because without him you wouldn't have any argument to so desperately latch onto ! Tarrant's deeds are not condoned by other Australians, unlike Muslim terrorism which we have seen celebrated by people dancing in the streets on the news. Posted by individual, Thursday, 4 February 2021 10:15:26 AM
| |
Hiya individual
So you use Tarrant's act as ammo in your attack on thinking people?! You Islamaphobics presumably applaud Communist China's treatment of China's Muslim minority. CHINA: A RAPE OF MUSLIMS COUNTRY This week, the BBC released a series of accounts from witnesses of systematic rape inside the re-education camp system in CHINA'S Xinjiang province, where more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim ethnic minorities are imprisoned. Refugees have previously recounted sexual abuse in the camps, but the BBC report gathers several key witnesses, including some women who were raped. These accounts track with the scale of the camps, recorded both through satellite data and on Chinese government websites—and with the government’s own sexualized rhetoric. But it remains unclear whether officials use rape as a deliberate weapon of genocide or whether it reflects systemic abuse and contempt for minority rights. For example, one witness describes Han Chinese men paying for access to imprisoned women in Xinjiang. That could be a sanctioned policy—or it could be the kind of ground-level corruption and abuse that pervades authoritarian systems. The Chinese government has a long history of sexualizing Muslim Uighur women in official texts. In ISLAMAPHOBIC thinking, Muslime Uighur men are portrayed as primitive, while the women are portrayed as hidden beauties that Han Chinese men can save. The CHINESE government actually prohibited intermarriage in Xinjiang until 1979, leading to a pervasive myth that marrying Uighur women was still forbidden. Now authorities promote intermarriage, including coerced unions. The Big Brother program, in which over 1 million Han Chinese have been assigned to Uighur homes to monitor everyday life, is also reportedly an opportunity for sexual assault and abuse, especially in households where the Uighur men have been imprisoned. Forcible sterilization has also been widely deployed to reduce the Uighur birth rate. The new revelations will likely stir further demands for action in the West. Democratic Western politicians have already demanded further inquiry into China’s “genocidal” actions in Xinjiang—a step that could, under new laws, scupper any potential trade agreement between the countries." Posted by plantagenet, Thursday, 4 February 2021 10:46:18 AM
|
I would love for you to enlighten all of us as to exactly what Islamic cultural values are superior to ours? Do you support wife beating? The idea that females are in effect just minors and the property of men? That raped women should be punished? C'mon girl. You can't just come out with a completely preposterous statement claiming that Islam is in any way superior to the west and then not tell us what these so called "superior" cultural values are. One suspects you don't have a clue yourself. You are making ridiculous statements because you just assume that western and Muslim cultures must somehow be equal, so they must have some superior cultural values, even though you don't have a clue what they could be.
For over a thousands yrears it was the Europeans who had to put up with endless attempts by the Muslims to conquer Europe. The Muslims invaded Spain, France, Malta, Sicily, The Balkans, Italy, Greece, and twice got to the gates of Vienna. They preyed as pirates on European shipping in the Mediterranean for a thousand years and made slaves of a million Europeans. When Muslim pirates attacked US ships, the US President at the time, (Jefferson) sent a formal letter to the Libyan Muslim leader asking why his ships were attacking US ships when the US had never done the Muslims any injury. The Libyan leader replied that it was OK for a Muslim to do anything they wanted to infidels.
So don't give me that "poor Islam is a victim of the awful western imperialists" crap.
I have no idea where you got this insane attitude that Christianity and Islam "are as bad as each other." Just in case you have not noticed, Muslims are fleeing Muslim countries to live in Christian lands, not the other way around. And one thing you can definitely say about Islam is, that the more Islamic a country is, the more of a sheethole it is.